[sage-devel] Sage make error

2017-11-16 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Could you post install.log ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Patchbot and its trust issues

2017-11-16 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 10:00 AM, David Loeffler wrote: > I'd like to request opinions on whether we should get rid of the "Trusted > Authors" check in the Sage patchbot. > > At present, the patchbot won't test a ticket unless all of the names in the > Trac "Authors" field have had at least one ti

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath

2017-11-16 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 1:36:17 PM UTC, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Erik Bray wrote: >> > On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:21 PM, kcrisman wrote: >> >> I'll admit that there seem to be some load bugs. E

[sage-devel] Re: Python3 and super()

2017-11-16 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
Le jeudi 16 novembre 2017 15:02:36 UTC+1, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > > so this should hamper the transition to Python3 > Yet another typo: "this should hamper" --> "this should not hamper" Sorry. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.

Re: [sage-devel] Python3 and super()

2017-11-16 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2017-11-16 15:02, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: I understand that the Python2-syntax of super, i.e. super(class, self), is still valid in Python3 [1] so this should not hamper the transition to Python3, but in writing new code (as I am doing at the moment) shouldn't we use the Python3 way, i.e. supe

[sage-devel] Re: "SageMath will replace Maple"

2017-11-16 Thread rjf
I assume that they decided there was not enough use of Maple to justify the expense of the license in CSC. The sentence indicating that Sage will "replace" Maple is probably a simplification of something like ... "Those (few?) current users of Maple on our computer system may find that Sage [Sa

[sage-devel] Re: Pattern matching in Sage

2017-11-16 Thread rjf
On Wednesday, November 15, 2017 at 12:07:45 AM UTC-8, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I would not be too surprised if someone had written a Lisp interpreter > in Python, representing Lisp code as stings :-) There is a certain universality in strings, given that humans read and write strings of cha