Re: [sage-devel] Matplotlib plotting style 'classic' hardcoded to Sage

2018-07-10 Thread Eric Gourgoulhon
HI, Le lundi 9 juillet 2018 12:53:24 UTC+2, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > Consulting > > https://matplotlib.org/users/dflt_style_changes.html > > we may keep specifically only the math font of the classic style by: > > mpl.rcParams['mathtext.fontset'] = 'cm' > mpl.rcParams['mathtext.rm'] = 'serif' >

[sage-devel] Re: Two-vertex graphs and is_prime()

2018-07-10 Thread David . Coudert
A clique is a "series" module in the modular decomposition because its complement is not connected. See the survey https://arxiv.org/pdf/0912.1457 * A module is of type parallel if G is not connected but its complement it * A module is of type series if G is connected but its complement is not.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Two-vertex graphs and is_prime()

2018-07-10 Thread Jori Mäntysalo
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, david.coud...@inria.fr wrote: A clique is a "series" module in the modular decomposition because its complement is not connected. See the survey https://arxiv.org/pdf/0912.1457 * A module is of type parallel if G is not connected but its complement it * A module is of type

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Tue 2018-07-10 01:46:56 UTC, kenichi fujisaki: > I followed the method of Mr. Pasechnik. > (I had to get (compile) the newest version of cUrl.) > And it works fine even with macos10.6.8. > Thank you very much. Dima Pasechnik suggested to upgrade to macOS 10.13, how can that "work fine even with

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread kenichi fujisaki
To get a recent enough version of curl, one way is to run sage -i curl Is not working >how can that "work fine even with macOS 10.6.8"? No worries. i've downloaded the curl source then cd curl-folder ./configure make finally, i got a brand new curl7.6 2018-07-10 11:19 GMT+02:00 Samuel

Re: [sage-devel] Names of objects in sage

2018-07-10 Thread Johan S. H. Rosenkilde
> The current implementations of _repr_ gets somewhat ridiculous when we > combine these naming conventions in classes like CombinatorialFreeModules > where we end up producing things like: > > sage: IwahoriHeckeAlgebra('A3',q,1) > Iwahori-Hecke algebra of type A3 in q,1 over Univariate Polynomia

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread kenichi fujisaki
Ah i see, My apologies, Mr. Lelievre. Let me clarify the situation, *I followed of your suggestion (Mr. Lelievre* *)*. 2018-07-10 11:38 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > To get a recent enough version of curl, one way is to run > > sage -i curl > > Is not working > > > >how can that "work fine

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread kenichi fujisaki
Ah i see, My apologies, Mr. Lelievre. Let me clarify the situation, *I followed your suggestion (Mr. Lelievre**)*. 2018-07-10 11:38 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > To get a recent enough version of curl, one way is to run > > sage -i curl > > Is not working > > > >how can that "work fine even

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread kenichi fujisaki
Ah i see, My apologies, Mr. Lelievre. Let me clarify the situation, *I followed your suggestion about cysignals trouble* 2018-07-10 11:38 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > To get a recent enough version of curl, one way is to run > > sage -i curl > > Is not working > > > >how can that "work fine

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread kenichi fujisaki
it was posted by Samuel Lelievre on the 8th of July 2018-07-10 12:22 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > Ah i see, > My apologies, Mr. Lelievre. > Let me clarify the situation, *I followed your suggestion about cysignals > trouble* > > 2018-07-10 11:38 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > >> To get a recent

Re: [sage-devel] How parallel should @parallel be?

2018-07-10 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:35 PM Julian Rüth wrote: > > Hello. > > since Sage 8.2 sage.parallel.ncpus.ncpus() returns 1 if you have no > environment variables such as MAKE, SAGE_NUM_THREADS, MAKEOPTS set. > > This number is used by the @parallel decorator and similar constructions to > determine t

Re: [sage-devel] How parallel should @parallel be?

2018-07-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2018-07-10 12:37, Erik Bray wrote: If I want to limit parallelization on a machine that I'm concurrently using for other work, that's kind of a decision a human has to make. One could argue the other way around: if I want Sage to use all resources on the machine that it's running on, that's

Re: [sage-devel] How parallel should @parallel be?

2018-07-10 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:43 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2018-07-10 12:37, Erik Bray wrote: > > If I want to limit > > parallelization on a machine that I'm concurrently using for other > > work, that's kind of a decision a human has to make. > > One could argue the other way around: if I wan

[sage-devel] Re: Sage fails to build on Arch linux, possible recurrence of an old bug

2018-07-10 Thread Antonio Rojas
El lunes, 9 de julio de 2018, 21:35:04 (UTC+2), Amit Wolecki escribió: > > Thank you all for the useful comments! > Antonio, I wasn't aware of the somewhat limiting way a repo installation > works, this remark made me try to stick to building from source. > >> >> Actually, scratch that. 'sage -i

Re: [sage-devel] unable to compile sage-8.2

2018-07-10 Thread kenichi fujisaki
Ok, for the time being i did: make -k 2018-07-10 12:25 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > it was posted by Samuel Lelievre on the 8th of July > > 2018-07-10 12:22 GMT+02:00 kenichi fujisaki : > >> Ah i see, >> My apologies, Mr. Lelievre. >> Let me clarify the situation, *I followed your suggestion

[sage-devel] Re: NTL 11.2.0

2018-07-10 Thread Victor Shoup
Bill, Above the diagonal, I believe Flint is using a Kronecker substitution algorithm, while NTL is using a multi-modular FFT. NTL always outperformed Flint in this region. It is the region below the diagonal where both are using Schoenhage-Strassen, and there you can see that NTL still lags b

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage fails to build on Arch linux, possible recurrence of an old bug

2018-07-10 Thread עמית וולצקי
I see, thanks Antonio for the fix! To make sure I get the big picture - distro package will use system services (e.g. python and especially pip) whereas the built from source installation has it's own compiled python env and is thus independent of the system installed python env. Do I get that righ

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage fails to build on Arch linux, possible recurrence of an old bug

2018-07-10 Thread Antonio Rojas
El martes, 10 de julio de 2018, 14:21:03 (UTC+2), Amit Wolecki escribió: > > I see, thanks Antonio for the fix! To make sure I get the big picture - > distro package will use system services (e.g. python and especially pip) > whereas the built from source installation has it's own compiled pyth

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage fails to build on Arch linux, possible recurrence of an old bug

2018-07-10 Thread עמית וולצקי
Gotcha. Many thanks. 2018-07-10 15:34 GMT+03:00 Antonio Rojas : > > > El martes, 10 de julio de 2018, 14:21:03 (UTC+2), Amit Wolecki escribió: >> >> I see, thanks Antonio for the fix! To make sure I get the big picture - >> distro package will use system services (e.g. python and especially pip)

[sage-devel] Cysignals release / upgrade for Sage 8.3

2018-07-10 Thread Erik Bray
Hello, There are a couple minor fixes in Cysignals since its last release that pertain to Cygwin. It be nice if, in time for the Sage 8.3 release, we could get a new release of Cysignals (e.g. 1.7.2) which includes those fixes, and bump the version in Sage to that. I'd be happy to do the release

[sage-devel] Re: Cysignals release / upgrade for Sage 8.3

2018-07-10 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Should be easy, I'll do that. I already created the Sage ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25814 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Cysignals release / upgrade for Sage 8.3

2018-07-10 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:46 PM Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Should be easy, I'll do that. > > I already created the Sage ticket: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/25814 Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from thi

[sage-devel] Re: NTL 11.2.0

2018-07-10 Thread 'Bill Hart' via sage-devel
Hi Victor, Thanks. That makes sense now. I was reading your diagram upside down! Indeed, on your diagram we use SSA below the diagonal. The multimodular algorithm was not faster than Kronecker substitution for us. But I think that was simply because we don't have a small primes FFT, or somethi

Re: [sage-devel] Names of objects in sage

2018-07-10 Thread Nils Bruin
On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 at 2:39:35 AM UTC-7, Johan S. H. Rosenkilde wrote: > > but now use the standard nomenclature for coding theory with a short > field description: > > sage: C = codes.random_linear_code(GF(25), 10, 3); C > [10, 3] linear code over GF(25) > > My first reaction is