Hi Abhishek,
On 2018-09-29, Abhishek Kesarwani <1907a...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No, I am getting this error:
>
sage --python
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> NameError: name 'sage' is not defined
"sage --python" is the command that you should use on the command
No, I am getting this error:
>>> sage --python
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
NameError: name 'sage' is not defined
On Friday, September 28, 2018 at 11:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 18:36 Abhishek Kesarwani, <1907...@gmail.com
You should also feel free to reach out to Andy Terrel or Leah Silen at
> NumFOCUS. I gave them a heads-up about this conversation as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>>
>>
Great!
Erik, also note Harald's post at
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/sGFOYBeEq-Q/UGrZfdV-AQAJ which
should pr
On Monday, September 24, 2018 at 3:12:12 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
> Certainly R and probably other similar mathematical FLOSS does have
> foundations...
>
I just came across this thread. Many years ago I had the idea to setup an
european "sage foundation" similar to the one of R. My main t
You should also feel free to reach out to Andy Terrel or Leah Silen at
NumFOCUS. I gave them a heads-up about this conversation as well.
Thanks,
Jason
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:17 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:11 PM Erik Bray wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > The topic
On Fri, 28 Sep 2018, 18:36 Abhishek Kesarwani, <1907a...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, sir, for replying. I tried to run it again after Installing
> Sage python2, it gives the following error.
>
What version of Sagemath have you installed?
Are you able to start Python by running
sage --python
Thank you, sir, for replying. I tried to run it again after Installing
Sage python2, it gives the following error.
1+1000:
1001
Load sage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
ImportError: No module named all
abc@Math-Sans:~/Do
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:11 PM Erik Bray wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The topic of Sage joining the NumFOCUS [1] organization was raised in
> the recent thread [2] about the SageMath Foundation. When I first
> started working on Sage I was frankly surprised that it wasn't already
> affiliated with N
Hi folks,
The topic of Sage joining the NumFOCUS [1] organization was raised in
the recent thread [2] about the SageMath Foundation. When I first
started working on Sage I was frankly surprised that it wasn't already
affiliated with NumFOCUS, along with many other projects on which Sage
is built
Yes, I think you're right. I deleted the problematic branch from that
repository and restarted the mirroring so we'll see. GitLab even
reported "Invalid reference name" as the relevant error.
Well, hopefully I won't make that mistake again!
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:49 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
By the way, I would not be surprised if the mirror
https://gitlab.com/sagemath/dev/trac
failed to update due to the same problem on git.sagemath.org
Read-only mirror of all the branches that are on trac.sagemath.org
Project ID: 6249490
Mirrored from git://git.sagemath.org/sage.git.
The reposito
On Thursday, September 27, 2018 at 6:03:58 AM UTC-4, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> At least three people have reported the same problem, just FYI.
> Perhaps something went wrong with building the .dmg. I don't know how
> to fix it (I don't know anything about dmgs):
>
Perhaps something interrupted th
David is right. In Magma, when you ask for the discriminant of a number
field you get the discriminant of its defining poynomial which is a
multiple of the field discriminant. You have to ask for the discriminant
of its ring of integers:
> R := PolynomialRing(Rationals());
> L := NumberField(x^7
This looks like a discrepancy between the discriminant of the polynomial
and the discriminant of the number field (which should be the discriminant
of the maximal order). Sure enough:
sage: O = L.maximal_order()
sage: O.discriminant().factor()
2^6 * 691^2
sage: O.basis()
[4/7*a^6 + 6/7*a^5 + 5/7*
The following computations were done on cocalc.com, version'SageMath
version 8.3, Release Date: 2018-08-03'
There seems to be a disagreement with Sage and Magma over the discriminant
of the number field defined by adjoining a root of the following polynomial
to Q:
x^7 - x^5 - 2*x^4 - 2*x^3 + 2
15 matches
Mail list logo
