On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 1:42 AM S. Diop wrote:
>
> config.log is attached. But I did not find any logs/pkgs/readline*.log in my
> sage 8.9 install directory.
there is a conflict with Anaconda installation, which provides readline.
In the beginning of your config.log one sees
PATH: /anaconda3/bin
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 05:19:00PM +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> what would be a long-term way to host this?
>
> http://www.i2m.univ-amu.fr/perso/andrieu-es.m/mp.html
>
> can be France-specific.
It depends on what you mean by long-term. Couple of years ? More than 10
years ? Your lifetime
the actual errors are somewhere in the middle of the log:
build/cythonized/sage/libs/readline.c:1446:36: error: use of
undeclared identifier 'rl_catch_signals'
__pyx_t_1 = __Pyx_PyInt_From_int(rl_catch_signals); if
(unlikely(!__pyx_t_1)) __PYX_ERR(0, 87, __pyx_L1_error)
could you post
config.l
Means: I successfully compiled Sage 8.9 on OSX Catalina with Xcode 11.0
On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 9:24:44 PM UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Sun 2019-10-13 08:26:52 UTC, Volker Braun:
>>
>> I just upgraded the OSX buildbot and Sage works
>>
> in case anybody is wondering. This is the fir
what would be a long-term way to host this?
http://www.i2m.univ-amu.fr/perso/andrieu-es.m/mp.html
can be France-specific.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e
On a possibly related note, I read somewhere that Catalina does not support
32-bit apps. So I suppose using older binaries that were not compiled with
this support (if that is even relevant to Sage, though at least for Cygwin
at one point it was) may be problematic.
--
You received this messa
I have found that activating a 3d jsmol animation in a sage 3.9 notebook is
broken. Although initial preview is correct activating the animation leads
to a graphic showing several small spheres (molecules?!). Reverting to
version 3.8 everything works. I build sage on Linux Mint 19.2.
--
You re
Thanks. Now the only conclusion we have about 10.15 that it's hard to
predict the outcome of
building Sage on it...
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 7:42 AM David Coudert wrote:
>
> Since it’s cleaner, I tried, and after a make distclean and the removal of
> MacOSX10.14.sdk, I was able to build Sage !
>