Yes, through Homebrew. I'll unlink it tomorrow and I'm guessing that'll
fix the problem. Thanks, I got confused because it looked like it was
grabbing it from my sage folder and not /usr/local, but I didn't notice ECL
being built.
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 11:09:19 PM UTC-4 Matthias Ko
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 4:42:23 PM UTC-7, Zachary Scherr wrote:
>
>I was building sage today, and the building of sage seems to work fine
> but building the documentation crashed for me at manifolds. Does anyone
> have any insight as to what's going on?
>
>From the log:
[manifold
I should probably also add that while sage builds with
the spkg-configure.m4 fix, my documentation will not build unless I brew
unlink singular.
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 10:33:32 AM UTC-4 Zachary Scherr wrote:
> I was just curious as to what the status of this issue is, and if there
>
You should probably follow the directions
here: https://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/installation/conda.html
and install sage into its own environment so that it correctly installs all
the dependencies. Sage 9.2 will support python 3.8.
On Wednesday, October 7, 2020 at 2:18:27 PM UTC-4 asv...@gmai
My Anaconda is instaled with Python 3.8.
I tried to attach Sage to Anaconda by running one of the commands listed
here
https://anaconda.org/conda-forge/sage
However, there is python incompatibility. Is there any plan for an upgrade?
The message on a terminal window is
UnsatisfiableError: The f
I was just curious as to what the status of this issue is, and if there was
anything I could do to help with review. I can build rc0 using Dima's
suggested spkg-configure.m4 fix, but I can't build it otherwise unless I
brew unlink singular first.
On Friday, September 11, 2020 at 6:47:23 PM UT
please see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30737
- the question is how to test this well.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 11:06 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 9:53 PM François Bissey wrote:
> >
> > That’s nice but it looks like there could be improvement to the authors’
> > list.
>
Dear sage-devel,
The Sage 9.2 cycle progresses, with Sage 9.2.rc0 recently released.
We still have three "blocker" and around a hundred "critical" tickets.
https://trac.sagemath.org/query?order=id&desc=1&group=status&col=id&col=summary&col=component&col=type&col=milestone&col=author&col=cc&statu