Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Kwankyu Lee
On Friday, October 23, 2020 at 4:13:52 PM UTC+9 Fredrik Johansson wrote: > I'm not sure if there can be such a field. For exact use, perhaps. In > general, Calcium will be much slower than RR or RBF if you just want > numerical values. It will be terrible for plotting, for example. In any > cas

[sage-devel] Re: missing docker images of sagemath

2020-10-23 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
It seems that all pipelines are failing since 9.2.beta4. Could someone please have a look ? https://gitlab.com/sagemath/sage/-/pipelines Le jeudi 15 octobre 2020 à 12:09:15 UTC+2, Sébastien Labbé a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Thanks to Vincent, I learned recently how to use continuous integration in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 11:19 AM Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 23/10/2020 à 10:27, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:04 AM Vincent Delecroix > > <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Le 23/10/2020 à 08:38, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > >>> >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Le 23/10/2020 à 10:27, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:04 AM Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: Le 23/10/2020 à 08:38, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : Currently working on that (see http://fredrikj.net/calcium/ and http://fredrikj.net/blog/2020/09/benchmarking-exa

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:04 AM Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Le 23/10/2020 à 08:38, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : > > > >> > >> Currently working on that (see http://fredrikj.net/calcium/ and > >> http://fredrikj.net/blog/2020/09/benchmarking-exact-dft-computation/). > >> > > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 11:51 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > On Wednesday, October 21, 2020 at 1:43:43 PM UTC+2 dim...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> I gather that (ignoring NaNs and +/-infinities) >> the addition and multiplication are commutative here > > > > Actually not even x+y == x+y is guaranteed and m

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Fredrik Johansson
On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 8:38 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote: > Currently working on that (see http://fredrikj.net/calcium/ and >> http://fredrikj.net/blog/2020/09/benchmarking-exact-dft-computation/). >> > > Looks great! The standard question is then: do you think your library fits > for the throne of Real

Re: [sage-devel] Re: "Real Field" -> "Real Floating-point Field"

2020-10-23 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Le 23/10/2020 à 08:38, Kwankyu Lee a écrit : Currently working on that (see http://fredrikj.net/calcium/ and http://fredrikj.net/blog/2020/09/benchmarking-exact-dft-computation/). Looks great! The standard question is then: do you think your library fits for the throne of RealField and coul