I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to
make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want
\mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}. Are you suggesting replacing
\Bold in the latex() method for the object, or keeping it but doing the
redefi
Hi Samuel,
This is a popular pure Python package. It seems to have a history of
non-breaking releases, so I would not mind adding it if it makes our lives
much easier (and keeps us from reinventing the wheel when implementing
algorithms.) As a maintainer of SageMath in conda-forge, I don't mind
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 2:49:11 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Unless there might be a reason for it, why not replacing lines like
> return r"\Bold{Q}"
> by
> return r"\mathbf{Q}"
> in the relevant _latex_ methods ?
>
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I would vote for updating our LaTeX methods to use more standard macros.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021, 10:49 Eric Gourgoulhon, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 20 décembre 2021 à 12:06:05 UTC+1, AlbertHilb a écrit :
>
>> Problem solved! Thank you very much!
>>
>
> That being said, it seems to me that these \new
Hi,
Le lundi 20 décembre 2021 à 12:06:05 UTC+1, AlbertHilb a écrit :
> Problem solved! Thank you very much!
>
That being said, it seems to me that these \newcommand{Bold} in each LaTeX
output (!) are an unnecessary pollution of the Jupyter notebooks in
%display latex mode. Unless there might