On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 2:21:08 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
> I have questions about some of the scripts in src/bin:
>
>- sage-native-execute: looks like a no-op. Delete?
>- sage-open — used in OS X; can we just use "open"?
>
> Yes on both of these. They have not been
I have questions about some of the scripts in src/bin:
- math-readline — used sometimes in Sage's mathematica interface. Is it
necessary?
- sage-inline-fortran — does anyone use this?
- sage-native-execute: looks like a no-op. Delete?
- sage-open — used in OS X; can we just use
I run Sage in a Sage Cell Server and on Terminal on my laptop. How do I
"reload" Sage on both of these to incorporate the fix?
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 3:21:13 PM UTC-5 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33410, ready for use and review
>
> On Wednesday,
Fixed in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33410, ready for use and review
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 12:09:57 PM UTC-8 adva...@gmail.com
wrote:
> If there's a bug, what would my next step be? When I do only induced
> volume, I don't get the correct result. Also, I see in
>
If there's a bug, what would my next step be? When I do only induced
volume, I don't get the correct result. Also, I see
in https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/16045 that people are able to use both
induced volume and lrs engine at once. Is this some previous version of
sage in which the error
Hi,
This link also works for me:
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11538-022-00999-4.pdf
Regards,
phiho
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 2:38 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:23 PM William Stein wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > UCLA just published a new paper about
On Monday, February 21, 2022 at 8:58:59 AM UTC Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Thanks for the report, I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33394
> to fix this.
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33394
needs review now.
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 8:38 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >
What Nils and Michael have explained to you is, of course, already
implemented in Sage.
Unfortunately in the combination with lrslib, there is a bug that prevents
it from working.
I have opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33410 for this.
On Wednesday, February 23, 2022 at 7:57:34 AM
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:23 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> UCLA just published a new paper about teaching Dynamics to about 1,400
> Biology students a year. They use Sage heavily in this course. The
> paper is freely available here:
>
>
On Wed, 2022-02-23 at 10:34 -0800, Advay Goel wrote:
> For example, I currently have a 10-dimensional polytope that is located in
> QQ^18. How would I bring this polytope into 10-dimensional space so that I
> can use LRS to calculate its volume?
If you have a ten-dimensional polytope, there
Hi
UCLA just published a new paper about teaching Dynamics to about 1,400
Biology students a year. They use Sage heavily in this course. The
paper is freely available here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358569003_Teaching_Dynamics_to_Biology_Undergraduates_the_UCLA_Experience
--
Hi Sébastien,
I pushed sagemath and sagemath-dev images for 9.5. Unfortunately, they are
quite a bit bigger than the images for 9.4, see
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33409.
I hope the images are functional nevertheless. Please let me know if there
is any problem with them.
julian
On
Thank you for the response.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "pull them back along the embedding of
a subspace containing the polytope to get a full one."
For example, I currently have a 10-dimensional polytope that is located in
QQ^18. How would I bring this polytope into 10-dimensional
Did you check the lrs documentation:
http://cgm.cs.mcgill.ca/~avis/C/lrslib/USERGUIDE.html#Volume%20Computation
? It only mentions volumes of full polytopes. You could of course project
the vertices yourself or pull them back along the embedding of a subspace
containing the polytope to get a
Hi All,
I aim to calculate the volumes of not-full dimensional polytopes. Using
ambient measure, the volume is always 0. So, I want to use induced measure.
At the same time, though, I also want the engine to be Lrs.
If I just do .volume(engine = 'lrs'), I always get 0. Is this an error? Or
If you do not care about choosing the port number, when you run
./sage -n jupyter
and port is already used, a new Jupyter starts on port 8889,
and so on.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
16 matches
Mail list logo
