Dear all,
Our first Sage developer calls last Thursday/Friday on Zoom were very
successful!
We are switching to video conferencing on Jitsi from now on. It is open
source software; see https://jitsi.org/about/
Thanks to all who filled out the poll to find times for regular meetings.
We'll use
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 2:43:08 PM UTC-7 David Roe wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 5:20 PM William Stein wrote:
>
>> Should we specify anything about who is eligible to vote? At least
>> some guidance might be useful, since you are strongly encouraging
>> people to be involved, and som
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 5:20 PM William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should we specify anything about who is eligible to vote? At least
> some guidance might be useful, since you are strongly encouraging
> people to be involved, and some people might wonder whether or not
> they should vote.
>
> "Subs
Hi,
Should we specify anything about who is eligible to vote? At least
some guidance might be useful, since you are strongly encouraging
people to be involved, and some people might wonder whether or not
they should vote.
"Subscribed to sage-devel" might not be a good criteria. For example,
Hara
Given that we've had far more interest in Github than Gitlab, and that it's
a lot easier to transfer from Github to Gitlab later, I agree with Dima
that the vote should be on just the question of whether to move to Github.
Moreover, John Palmieri made a convincing argument (to me at least) that we
All good on conda-forge. I've added a link to our section in the
installation guide.
On Monday, September 19, 2022 at 12:31:47 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> What's the state of building Sage under conda (with its packages
> installed)?
>
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:26 PM Matthias Koeppe
>
What's the state of building Sage under conda (with its packages installed)?
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 8:26 PM Matthias Koeppe
wrote:
>
> Previous release tours had code examples (and graphics) for new features,
> which made them a nice read - see for example
> https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/Rele
Previous release tours had code examples (and graphics) for new features,
which made them a nice read - see for
example https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.6
Currently https://trac.sagemath.org/wiki/ReleaseTours/sage-9.7 only has
bullet points... Let's expand it
--
You received
On Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 8:12:48 AM UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> On Saturday, September 10, 2022 at 5:09:04 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> I've enabled wikis on our GitHub and started
>>
>> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/migration-from-trac-to-Git**b
>>
>
I would suggest th
On Mon, 19 Sep 2022, 15:35 William Stein, wrote:
> Here is a 3-minute section of a PyCon 2022 keynote by the steering
> council discussing migration of CPython to GitHub:
>
> https://youtu.be/m2R5shF1pLc?t=535
>
> In particular, they talk about how much effort went into the
> migration, and just
Here is a 3-minute section of a PyCon 2022 keynote by the steering
council discussing migration of CPython to GitHub:
https://youtu.be/m2R5shF1pLc?t=535
In particular, they talk about how much effort went into the
migration, and just how difficult it was, and how GitHub was
directly involved with
Matthias Koeppe wrote:
> This is great question, thanks for the pointer to this GitLab.com URL.
> I've updated
>
https://github.com/sagemath/sage/wiki/Github-vs-Gitlab-vs-trac#in-favor-of-gitlab
> based on it.
Additionally, here in France at least, many universities and research
institutes already
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 1:46 AM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sunday, September 18, 2022 at 2:55:34 PM UTC-7 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, 22:44 John H Palmieri, wrote:
>>>
>>> William, this is exactly why I search in the sage-trac Google group rather
>>> than on t
13 matches
Mail list logo
