[sage-devel] Re: Help wanted: Trac wiki migration, improve markup conversion code

I don't know if this is helpful, but I wrote a script to convert the trac wiki to GitHub ~9 years ago: https://github.com/swenson/sagewiki to convert the trac / MoinMoin pages to gollum (github wiki). On Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 9:55:38 AM UTC-8 seb@gmail.com wrote: > For now I would

[sage-devel] sageb0t notifications

Hi, At some point in the past (2014?), I setup a GitHub account called sageb0t. I no longer have access to the account, which is fine. But, I still receive email notifications at vadius+sage...@gmail.com Could whoever runs this or has access to it remove my email address from the notifications

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

Perfect. :) On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 7:01 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Christopher Swenson > wrote: > > I like the idea of having an official Docker image. > > > > I think also creating a "standard", say, VirtualBox image with t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Sage Days 65 mini report

I like the idea of having an official Docker image. I think also creating a "standard", say, VirtualBox image with the latest Sage on a reasonable Linux OS (like the latest LTS ubuntu), and releasing that as well could be cool. --Christopher On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 3:35 PM, William Stein wrote:

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Notebook shutdown

Is there any use case for sagenb.org, or a potential replacement, that isn't covered by SageMathCloud? --Christopher On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:17 PM, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage Developers, > > We've posted the following message on the http://sagenb.org site: > > "This Sage notebook server

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Days during Mar 21-29, 2015?

I'm possibly interested in May. Will depend a lot on how the next month goes. I can't do March at all though. On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:28 PM, William Stein wrote: > Follow-up question: > > Is anybody interested in a Sage Days in *SAN DIEGO* May 24-whenever, 2015? > > William > > On Mon, Feb 23

Re: [sage-cloud] Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud now open source

I'm usually pretty against AGPL, though it may make a little bit of sense here. I often see companies "open source" their code under AGPL, which basically allows them to call themselves open source, but still able to sell commercial licenses, as few other companies will want to touch AGPL code. (I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud now open source

I would definitely be interested in another SMC Sage Days (or SMC days). On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:29 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher Swenson > wrote: > > Awesome! I look forward to poking around. > > It won't be easy, since mos

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SageMathCloud now open source

Awesome! I look forward to poking around. On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, kcrisman wrote: > >> SageMathCloud is now completely open source.The complete source >> code is here, so if you've ever wondered how something in SMC works, >> you can now find out... >> >> https://github.com/sag

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Call qsort from cython code .... with an inlined comparison function ?!

There's a sort.h library you should be able to include that will have quick sort + many others, and will allow the compiler to properly inline functions. https://github.com/swenson/sort (disclaimer: I wrote it). I get about a 10x speed improvement over qsort just for the ability to inline functions

Re: [sage-devel] VOTE: code of conduct - ends Monday at midnight, PST.

[X] Yes -- adopt the code of conduct stated below (*) On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:38 AM, John Foster wrote: > > On 11/22/2014 06:47 PM, William Stein wrote: > >> >> [X] Yes -- adopt the code of conduct stated below (*) >> >> [ ] No -- do not adopt the code of conduct stated below >> >> >> > -- > J

Re: [sage-devel] Re: drop future first-class SPARC support?

Thanks for the feedback. Is there anyone who would be willing and able to host and administer the Sparc machines? On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 3:01 PM, William Stein wrote: > Clarification: I am not interested in hosting a Sparc machine at UW. > On Mar 5, 2014 2:32 PM, "Volker Braun" wrote: > >> On

Re: [sage-devel] Re: drop future first-class SPARC support?

I'll be sure to ask what kind of CPUs they intend to donate. I was also hoping that UW might be able to provide power, cooling, and administration. On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 2:20 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Wednesday, March 5, 2014 11:04:01 AM UTC+1, Dr David Kirkby wrote: > >> On 5 Mar

Re: [sage-devel] Re: drop future first-class SPARC support?

Sounds like my friend might be able to get some boxes donated. Do we want Solaris 10 and 11, I presume? --Christopher On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 4:12 PM, Christopher Swenson wrote: > I have a friend. I'll ask. Couldn't hurt. :) > > --Christpoher > > > On Tue, Mar 4,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: drop future first-class SPARC support?

I have a friend. I'll ask. Couldn't hurt. :) --Christpoher On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Tuesday, March 4, 2014 8:27:59 PM UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> Skynet has a Sun Blade 2500, afaik that is the same as David Kirby's >> machine. It is basically an or

[sage-devel] Re: Sage Days: Transitioning to Git

I'm also interested, and I live in Portland. --Christopher On Nov 8, 2012 10:40 PM, "Keshav Kini" wrote: > "R. Andrew Ohana" writes: > > > William and I are planning a workshop focused on transitioning Sage > > over to Git. We have some funding available, so please contact me if > > you are int

Re: [sage-devel] ARM box?

Raspberry Pi? Though I think running qemu would be faster... On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > William, you once or twice mentioned that you were going to order an ARM > box for Sage development. Did anything happen already? > > -- > You received this message because you

Re: [sage-devel] This year's bug days

Now that I am only a short ride from WA, that's fine by me. :) San Diego might also work for me. --Christopher On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi William, > > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:11 AM, William Stein wrote: > > Due to generous funding for this purpose, I'm planning t

[sage-devel] PyCon 2013 Call for Proposals

Hello Sage Developers, I thought I would give people a heads up that there is still about a month left to propose a PyCon talk: https://us.pycon.org/2013/speaking/cfp/ The submission deadline is September 28, 2012. PyCon itself will be March 13–21, 2013 in Santa Clara, CA, USA. There have been

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Proposed Project

Detexify does some neat mathematics handwriting recognition: http://detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html --Christopher On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Julien Puydt wrote: > Le 24/07/2012 16:13, Jason Ekstrand a écrit : > > Then the big >> issue would simply be the math handwriting detection (I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage Days 41, EduDays 4

Looks good. --Christopher On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:08 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > > On Monday, June 18, 2012 12:22:16 PM UTC-4, Jason Grout wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've finished posting the rest of the videos for Sage Days 41 and Sage >> EduDays 4 at >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/**days41

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Linear Algebra thematic tutorial

Looks pretty good. One small thing I noticed: in the introduction, you say that there is a free, public server available in sagemath.org -- did you mean sagenb.org? --Christopher On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 3:02 AM, mmarco wrote: > I would propose to include a section on morphisms of vector spaces.

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Gap packages

, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Christopher Swenson > wrote: > > Also see this wonderful flow chat written by some of my > > coworkers: http://cl.ly/5nAo > > I like it! > > They forgot the WTFPL: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Gap packages

I was also going to say that it would be great to get a public statement from the author that either licenses the software or releases the copyright into the public domain. From what I understand, without an explicit statement, the work is still copyrighted and "license free", which can be dangerou

Re: [sage-devel] notebook hack of the day

Sorry. I wasn't clear. I meant when giving talks, you should make sure you have tried those things. The notebook tends to work fine, but you need to be careful about long lines and big images. :) On May 11, 2012 6:17 PM, "William Stein" wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:

Re: [sage-devel] notebook hack of the day

Great tip! I also recommend you make sure everything works under zoom and at 1024x768. On May 11, 2012 6:09 PM, "William Stein" wrote: > Hi, > > Have you ever given a presentation with the Sage notebook and been > annoyed by it "jumping all over the place" when you press shift-enter > or click "

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage android project

Oh, my bad. It looks like we intended what you said -- so we wouldn't have a full port of Sage on the device at all. --Christopher On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 15:08, Jason Grout wrote: > On 3/16/12 4:57 PM, Christopher Swenson wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I have a l

Re: [sage-devel] Sage goes GSoC

Congrats on getting picked this year! --Christopher On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 14:56, Harald Schilly wrote: > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 22:49, David Roe wrote: > > People may have been discouraged by our repeated failure to be selected > in > > previous years. > > yes, i think our goal should be to

Re: [sage-devel] sage android project

Hi! I have a little bit of Android and Sage experience, so I thought I would give you a tip or two to get started. I would imagine that the mentors of this project saw this as roughly four phases: 1. Get up to speed on Android development. This mean download and installing the SDK (see http://de

Re: [sage-devel] Re: git and gerrit

I agree with a lot of what was just said. My only possible issue with the github workflow: I'm not sure how it interacts with having multiple people who have control of the "master" (central) repo. When a pull request comes in, can anyone who has push access to the repo take control of that pull r

Re: [sage-devel] Re: git and gerrit

are some exceptions, naturally: when large, new sections of code are being developed, it is not unheard of to accept commits that don't actually work. --Christopher On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:38, Jason Grout wrote: > On 2/21/12 9:26 AM, Christopher Swenson wrote: > >> Jason,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: git and gerrit

Jason, I forwarded this thread to Shawn Pearce, the primary author of gerrit, and have included his response below. --Christopher -- Forwarded message -- From: Shawn Pearce Date: Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 15:16 Subject: Re: [sage-devel] Re: git and gerrit To: Christopher Swenson Cc

Re: [sage-devel] Re: git and gerrit

Reviewed changes should be very small so that they are easy to verify and review. Also, most changes are bugfixes or minor feature adds, so it should not create large, hard to merge commits. If you have such a large change, you should probably be splitting into multiple reviews anyway. I know the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: GSOC 2012

I thought I would not that, to whomever is going to write the application, be sure to list me down as a Google supporter, since I think it would be great to have a Sage GSoC project. There should be a section along the lines of "vouchers from Google and other large organizations". If I had a bit

Re: [sage-devel] xcode and gcc

Ah, my bad. I misinterpreted the original intent as "requiring" GCC as part of building Sage from source. Carry on. :) --Christopher On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 15:57, William Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Christopher Swenson > wrote: > > -1 for distri

Re: [sage-devel] xcode and gcc

-1 for distributing our own version of gcc. As someone who has been peripherally involved with this sort of thing at Google, here are some downsides: 1) several hours of extra compiling and testing (a full boostrap build of GCC can be very painful, and running every test can take a very long time

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage days numbering

Fair enough. :) --Christopher On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:46, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Christopher Swenson > wrote: > > Looking in rings/complex_number.pyx, it looks like it a simple lex > ordering. > > I would bet that this is because pe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage days numbering

Looking in rings/complex_number.pyx, it looks like it a simple lex ordering. I would bet that this is because people would be annoyed that you get an exception if you tried to sort a list of complex numbers, even though you can't. :) --Christopher On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:22, Volker Braun wro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage days numbering

Now that's just cheating. --Christopher On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:58, Nils Bruin wrote: > On Jan 25, 7:05 am, Christopher Swenson wrote: > > If we have possible confusions about the numberiung, we should give them > > complex number identifier. So, 37, 37 + i, 37 - i, et

Re: [sage-devel] Re: sage days numbering

If we have possible confusions about the numberiung, we should give them complex number identifier. So, 37, 37 + i, 37 - i, etc. Who knows which one comes first then? --Christopher On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:39, Sébastien Labbé wrote: > > > I thought last time we had this discussion (for 35.5