Similar error shows up on the notebook for the
%fortran magic...
There is a linking against -L"Using built-in specs. ??
Further, inline_fortran is not being tested?
I'm reading the code... but some of you probably now better/faster how
to p
Fortran interfaces.
Now I am having problems importing Fortran extensions such the one
listed below.
Does anyone have an idea what the import error means? And how to work
around it?
Please have a look on [3] for some more details.
Any help is appreciated.
Regards,
Guilherme
System: OS X
On 30/01/12 22:06, François Bissey wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:20:50 Guilherme Brondani Torri wrote:
Hello!
I jut tried to compile Sage 4.8 and 5.0.beta1 on a OS X 10.6.8 (Snow
Leopard) without success.
I just did:
export MAKE="make -j8"
make
Even after R fails the compilation
mehow?
If it is too much trouble I will go on and compile Sage from source.
Regards,
Guilherme
It doesn't find *my* $SAGE_ROOT/local/lib
...
gcc: assimulo/lib/kinsol_jmod.c
gcc: assimulo/lib/kinpinv.c
gcc -m64 -L/Users/buildbot/build/sage/bsd-1/bsd_64_binary/build/
sage-4.8/local/l
s are more meaningful to you... Hope it helps...
Regards,
Guilherme
On 13/10/11 08:49, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
Hi,
I posted an updated spkg at
http://www.infres.enst.fr/~flori/sage/pynac-0.2.4.spkg
This is by no mean an official or definitive package, but it should at
least include the mentione
-build
it breaks since I don't have the pynac/order.h
On sage-4.7.1 hg tells me that 2 hunks are failing to apply (on
/symbolic/expression.pyx).
Should I be using sage-4.7.2 ?
Whenever you have the time post once again the spkg I would like to give
another try.
Best regards,
Guilherme
Sage under gdb with 'sage -gdb' to debug this.
Sage will now terminate.
----
/Users/guilherme/sage-4.7.1/local/bin/sage-sage: line 301: 13128
Segmentation fault sage-ipython "$@" -i
If I run under
Hi,
Didn't mean to reply to myself, just wanted to include some further
information I found.
I found the following worksheet where the author managed to generate C
code from symbolic expressions. He also did some optimization
collecting subexpressions.
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2659/
Code is
Hi Jason,
Does that use fast_callable? I couldn't find a mention of fast_callable
in the worksheet anywhere except in the descriptive text at the top.
For some the mentioned worksheets are not at there.
I republished them:
My original:
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/3117/
Modified by Marteen:
Hi Richard,
I am sorry, I replied directly to you instead of here in the list.
I apologize for that.
Anyway, thank you for the suggestions.
Regards,
Guilherme
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel
ctor) as a function. Lazy and fast.
If you print([expression]) it is almost Fortran. Maybe a
print_fortran([expression]) is what I am looking for.
> Hope this helps,
Sure it helped! Thanks.
Regards,
Guilherme
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
tions wouldn't
hurt.
Therefore I am looking for instructions on how you guys would proceed
do write such translator... if not yet available.
Any thoughts or alternatives?
Regards,
Guilherme
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send a
Hi Thierry
On May 13, 11:04 am, Thierry Dumont
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Asimulo seems great: it does exactly what I wanted to do: integrate
> Radau5 in Sage. Radau5 is from far the best method for the integration
> of (very) stiff ODEs...
>
I couldn't find an Assimulo example with Radau5.
I tweaked t
thon-sundials. I have already
something, but somehow I am mixing x86_64 with i368 libs on the OSX...
Assimulo besides of having more developers they also have a trac and
more documentation.
That is it. What should I do next with these packages??
Looking forward for further discussion and corrections.
om the experienced people there.
Best,
Guilherme
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Hi Ondrej,
> Will you create some spkg packages for the codes above? If so, I'd be
> interested in it too, and I can test them.
Once I learn how to do a spkg I will be pleased to do so. I'm reading
the docs...
As I mentioned I just started with Sage.
Both Assimulo and python-sundials *are workin
Hello,
A quick followup on the subject of finding a Python wrapper for
SUNDIALS.
Good news is that there are a few projects that did it already.
I will short review what I found.
1) python-sundials http://code.google.com/p/python-sundials/
Just a Cython wrapper around the original SUNDIALS code (
On May 5, 7:04 am, Thierry Dumont wrote:
> If it is possible, I propose (me) to make a package of ODE/DAE
> intergrators: ther is a lot of methods which would be nice in Sage like
> Implicit R-K methods, Symplectic methods and so on...
I naively volunteer to help on setting a package with updat
On May 4, 6:48 am, Joris Vankerschaver
wrote:
> I wrote a C++ wrapper around DASSL some time ago,
I've being tracking/learning more about available codes.
I was amazed to learn that there is a huge zoo of many different
solvers.
I gathered some links and I am trying to tabulate this informatio
On May 4, 1:48 am, David Joyner wrote:
> It seems there is a python interface to
> daetoolshttp://daetools.sourceforge.net/w/index.php/PyDAE_user_guide
PyDAE seems *very* interesting.
It also quite a large beast. It sweeps from Blas, SUNDIALS IDAS (!),
Umfpack, MUMPS, Trilinos...
Maybe it makes
ere other options? Comments are welcomed.
Kind regards,
Guilherme Brondani Torri
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://grou
21 matches
Mail list logo
