[sage-devel] Re: sage start-up errors

2009-12-02 Thread strogdon
On Dec 1, 2:10 pm, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote: On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 04:17:50 strogdon wrote: Hey Francois. I too thought that perhaps the spkg supplied flags would override any changes with custom flags. However the custom flags seem to be appended to the spkg provided

[sage-devel] Re: sage start-up errors

2009-12-02 Thread strogdon
On Dec 2, 2:28 pm, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote: On Thu, 03 Dec 2009 08:03:44 strogdon wrote: So, it would appear that it is not the CFLAGS but whether CFLAGS has been set to something. The no-strict-aliasing is suspiciously missing. The documentation I have on gcc 4.3.4

[sage-devel] Re: sage start-up errors

2009-11-30 Thread strogdon
? Gentoo custom flags for 32 bit architectures do not seem to have this build problem. On an amd64 laptop I have, the CFLAGS setting CFLAGS=-march=k8 -O2 -pipe also results in a sage that fails. Steve On Nov 5, 2:32 pm, strogdon strog...@d.umn.edu wrote: I'm building sage 4.2 on an amd64 machine

[sage-devel] rpy build script fails for sage-3.0

2008-04-23 Thread strogdon
On my Gentoo box I unpacked the subject tarball, changed to the sage directory and did a make with the results: gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2) RHOMES= [] DEBUG= True Setting RHOMES

[sage-devel] Re: rpy build script fails for sage-3.0

2008-04-23 Thread strogdon
] dortmund.de wrote: On Apr 23, 4:52 pm, strogdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On my Gentoo box I unpacked the subject tarball, changed to the sage directory and did a make with the results: gcc version 4.1.2 (Gentoo 4.1.2 p1.0.2