On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Removing the package from unstable doesn't prevent you from working on
the package. It's just a way to clean up Debian. It will be very easy to
re-upload when you will have something that builds in i386 and amd64
(though it might be better to
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
In addition, upstream reports
On May 8, 5:46 am, Clement Pernet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rumors are always true!
I meant to merge linbox_wrap in linbox/interfaces for the 2.0 linbox
release. Depending on how urgent is your need for this to happen, I may
consider doing it in a 1.1.6 release instead.
What's the timescale
Okay, I will not bother submitting the flintqs package to Debian,
since it sounds like things may move to flint entirely before the SAGE
package makes it into Debian upstream anyway.
-Tim Abbott
On May 8, 10:02 am, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The new quadratic sieve included in
It turns out the singular problem was that /usr/lib/libsingular.so has
to be marked as executable for Singular to load it.
The LinBox problem went away when I upgraded to 3.0.1alpha1.
-Tim Abbott
On Apr 26, 9:28 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Apr 27, 2:57 am,
