Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-08 Thread William Stein
On Thursday, September 8, 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2016-09-07 17:08, William Stein wrote: > >> like running top and parsing the output... >> > > Yes, there was a big "WTF?" moment when I saw that :-) Imagine it is early 2006, that there are only two users of

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-08 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-09-07 17:08, William Stein wrote: like running top and parsing the output... Yes, there was a big "WTF?" moment when I saw that :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread Thierry Dumont
[x] I agree, let's make psutil standard -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Hello, > > at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21421 we propose to add the Python > package "psutil" as standard package for Sage. The tarball is 308KB, > installed it is about 624KB. The use case is replacing >

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread Erik Bray
On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > [ x ] I agree, let's make psutil standard I've used psutil in the past; it's a nice package. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread Thierry
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 02:28:31PM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > Hello, > > at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21421 we propose to add the Python > package "psutil" as standard package for Sage. The tarball is 308KB, > installed it is about 624KB. The use case is replacing >

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2016-09-07 14:48, Vincent Delecroix wrote: Under the assumption that there is nothing more in memory_info.py than in psutil Well, psutil goes way beyond what memory_info.py provides. The only logic that we would still need to keep from memory_info.py is these few lines, which can easily

Re: [sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread Vincent Delecroix
Under the assumption that there is nothing more in memory_info.py than in psutil [ ] I agree, let's make psutil standard Do you have an open ticket for testing psutil replacements? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To

[sage-devel] Add psutil as standard package

2016-09-07 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Hello, at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21421 we propose to add the Python package "psutil" as standard package for Sage. The tarball is 308KB, installed it is about 624KB. The use case is replacing src/sage/misc/memory_info.py From https://pypi.python.org/pypi/psutil psutil is a