Re: [sage-devel] Continuous benchmarking

2019-06-03 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Sat, Jun 1, 2019 at 12:28 PM Volker Braun wrote: > > Any kind of shared cpu container solution like openstack is also going to be > unsuitable for benchmarking, I think. There is going to be lots of background > stuff that the test process has no control / visibility of. Yes-and-no. It

Re: [sage-devel] Continuous benchmarking

2019-06-01 Thread Volker Braun
Any kind of shared cpu container solution like openstack is also going to be unsuitable for benchmarking, I think. There is going to be lots of background stuff that the test process has no control / visibility of. On Friday, May 31, 2019 at 5:31:22 PM UTC+2, E. Madison Bray wrote: > > On

Re: [sage-devel] Continuous benchmarking

2019-05-31 Thread E. Madison Bray
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 8:07 AM Samuel Lelièvre wrote: > > Dear sage-devel, > > This blog post on continuous benchmarking looks interesting! > > https://medium.com/@wolfv/building-an-open-source-continuous-benchmark-system-717839093962 > > There have been related discussions on this list in the

[sage-devel] Continuous benchmarking

2019-05-30 Thread Samuel Lelièvre
Dear sage-devel, This blog post on continuous benchmarking looks interesting! https://medium.com/@wolfv/building-an-open-source-continuous-benchmark-system-717839093962 There have been related discussions on this list in the past, for example around airspeed velocity: