On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 at 11:16AM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > In Python, I could so something like
> >
> > the_verbatim_line.replace('sage: ', '', 1)
> >
> > but LaTeX does not make string handling easy.
>
> Precisely. So it sounds tempting to have latex write a quoted string
> in the
Hi Dan!
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 09:10:20AM +0900, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 11:32PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
> > syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
> >
> > \begin{sageexam
Hi Nicolas,
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 at 11:32PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
> syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
>
> \begin{sageexample}
> sage: 1 + 1
> sage: def f(x):
> ... x^2
>
Hi Dan!
I played with sagetex today. That's cool stuff :-)
I have a feature request: an environment where I could use the same
syntax as in usual doctests (without the sage results):
\begin{sageexample}
sage: 1 + 1
sage: def f(x):
... x^2
sage: f(3)
\end
