Re: [sage-devel] No need for OpenSSL

2010-02-12 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I agree in this case, something went wrong, but on other occasions, I've seen this problem without lots of modules failing. Here is one section of a previous build failure on SPARC: Failed to find the necessary bits to build these mod

Re: [sage-devel] No need for OpenSSL

2010-02-12 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: To see what would happen, I went and grabbed the OpenSolaris image at http://virtualbox.wordpress.com/images/opensolaris/ , installed gcc, moved the openssl directory out of /usr/include, and b

Re: [sage-devel] No need for OpenSSL

2010-02-11 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Robert Bradshaw wrote: To see what would happen, I went and grabbed the OpenSolaris image at http://virtualbox.wordpress.com/images/opensolaris/ , installed gcc, moved the openssl directory out of /usr/include, and built Python 2.6.4 fr

Re: [sage-devel] No need for OpenSSL

2010-02-11 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Robert Bradshaw wrote: To see what would happen, I went and grabbed the OpenSolaris image at http://virtualbox.wordpress.com/images/opensolaris/ , installed gcc, moved the openssl directory out of /usr/include, and built Python 2.6.4 from source. The result: op...@opensolaris:~/Python-2.6.4$

Re: [sage-devel] No need for OpenSSL

2010-02-07 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 6, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Feb 6, 2010, at 2:09 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Sorry, I realised the problem - we are discussing two different issues. On Solaris 10 (SPARC), i.e. t2, this has never been an issue, as python has built ok. There is no need to do anyth