Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-13 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On 13 February 2024 00:58:04 GMT, Nils Bruin wrote: >On Monday 12 February 2024 at 15:58:11 UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >What's rotten and decaying - well, the most obvious points are: > >* pynac (memory leaks, bugs, sketchy or no docs, authors left long time >ago) > >* commutative

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-12 Thread 'Martin R' via sage-devel
For me - personally - the problem that Vincent pointed out has an emotional flavour: most of the threads on sage-devel are on (lcertainly important) technicalities. The discussion about how to implement math has mostly moved to github, and split into very very many issues that are hard to find

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-12 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 4:58:05 PM UTC-8 Nils Bruin wrote: Each of those components could definitely use attention. However, the skill set required to work on those components is quite different from that on working on (re)packaging existing, maintained python projects. People choose

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-12 Thread Nils Bruin
On Monday 12 February 2024 at 15:58:11 UTC-8 Dima Pasechnik wrote: What's rotten and decaying - well, the most obvious points are: * pynac (memory leaks, bugs, sketchy or no docs, authors left long time ago) * commutative algebra, in particular Singular-based (memory leaks, bugs, no docs,

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 6:55 PM Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I fully second the observation of Michael though it might have few to > do with the github switch. Sage development nowadays does not seem to > be anymore about math research and efficient computations but

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-12 Thread Matthias Koeppe
On Monday, February 12, 2024 at 10:55:37 AM UTC-8 Vincent Delecroix wrote: Sage development nowadays does not seem to be anymore about math research and efficient computations but mostly about "dependencies", "infrastructure" and "maintenance". I am always depressed by reading the change logs.

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-12 Thread Vincent Delecroix
I fully second the observation of Michael though it might have few to do with the github switch. Sage development nowadays does not seem to be anymore about math research and efficient computations but mostly about "dependencies", "infrastructure" and "maintenance". I am always depressed by

Re: [sage-devel] One year of Sage development on GitHub

2024-02-08 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 11:30 +, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > We should not try to compete, in effect, with Conda etc, yet we do. This is > the primary reason for slowness. > My personal stats for the year 2023-02-08 through 2024-02-08: Commits: 423 Reviews: 38 Zero of those have anything