Le jeudi 23 décembre 2021 à 03:16:13 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
> Sure, that sounds like a good idea.
>
>
In the above example, I used LatexExpr as a place holder for
_bold_command, but maybe there is a better way (at least, LatexExpr has the
advantage to not require any new injection in
Sure, that sounds like a good idea.
- John
On Wednesday, December 22, 2021 at 3:05:44 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 décembre 2021 à 00:26:58 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
>> I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to
>> make its behavior
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 3:26:58 PM UTC-8 John H Palmieri wrote:
> I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to
> make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want
> \mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}.
>
If we are keeping \Bold
Le mercredi 22 décembre 2021 à 00:26:58 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
> I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to
> make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want
> \mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}.
>
The customization could
I have no objection to this, but the purpose for using \Bold{...} was to
make its behavior easily customizable, since some people might want
\mathbf{...} and some might want \mathbb{...}. Are you suggesting replacing
\Bold in the latex() method for the object, or keeping it but doing the
On Tuesday, December 21, 2021 at 2:49:11 AM UTC-8 Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
> Unless there might be a reason for it, why not replacing lines like
> return r"\Bold{Q}"
> by
> return r"\mathbf{Q}"
> in the relevant _latex_ methods ?
>
+1
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
I would vote for updating our LaTeX methods to use more standard macros.
On Tue, 21 Dec 2021, 10:49 Eric Gourgoulhon, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le lundi 20 décembre 2021 à 12:06:05 UTC+1, AlbertHilb a écrit :
>
>> Problem solved! Thank you very much!
>>
>
> That being said, it seems to me that these
Hi,
Le lundi 20 décembre 2021 à 12:06:05 UTC+1, AlbertHilb a écrit :
> Problem solved! Thank you very much!
>
That being said, it seems to me that these \newcommand{Bold} in each LaTeX
output (!) are an unnecessary pollution of the Jupyter notebooks in
%display latex mode. Unless there
Problem solved! Thank you very much!
Il giorno domenica 19 dicembre 2021 alle 21:55:55 UTC+1
dmo...@deductivepress.ca ha scritto:
> Yes, this is the intended behaviour. If you don't like it, then, as a
> workaround, you could try to clear the variable called
>
Yes, this is the intended behaviour. If you don't like it, then, as a
workaround, you could try to clear the variable called
"sage_configurable_latex_macros". YMMV, but this works for me in a fresh
sage session:
sage: from sage.misc.latex_macros import sage_configurable_latex_macros
10 matches
Mail list logo
