[sage-devel] Re: Boost Python (and enumeration of short vectors)

IMHO we should just ship all of boost. Picking a particular subset just adds an extra packaging burden on our side just to save a few megabytes. It is by far the most popular third-party C++ library out there, and has lots of useful features. I don't really see the problem with Cython in your u

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Boost

On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On Dec 26, 11:03 am, Mag Gam wrote: >> I will compile boost my self. But why the cropped? is it because of >> license, size, compile time, etc..? > > The subset of boost needed for polybori, another spkg (Sage package), > is included in Sa

[sage-devel] Re: Boost

On Dec 26, 11:03 am, Mag Gam wrote: > I will compile boost my self. But why the cropped? is it because of > license, size, compile time, etc..? The subset of boost needed for polybori, another spkg (Sage package), is included in Sage. One can probably easily create a version of boost spkg that

Re: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Boost

I will compile boost my self. But why the cropped? is it because of license, size, compile time, etc..? I won't mind getting a "beefed" up version of SAGE. Sage is great but recently, it seemed I had to get a LOT of packages on the side... On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Martin Albrecht wrot

Re: Re: [sage-devel] Re: Boost

On Saturday 25 December 2010, Mag Gam wrote: > Yes. Thanks! > > On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > > Its a standard package: boost-cropped-1.34.1.spkg Note that cropped really means cropped, i.e. it only contains a subset of Boost (which could be extended if needed) Cheer

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Boost

Yes. Thanks! On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > Its a standard package: boost-cropped-1.34.1.spkg > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For mo

[sage-devel] Re: Boost

Its a standard package: boost-cropped-1.34.1.spkg -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL:

[sage-devel] Re: Boost

There is a link "open-source packages" on the main page for Sage: http://sagemath.org/ which is one place you could check. I think that list is fairly up-to-date. It does list Boost. Is that the boost you meant? Bill. On Dec 25, 4:30 pm, Mag Gam wrote: > Is boost part of Sage? Maybe we should a

[sage-devel] Re: boost coverage by 0.5%

You can get another .25% or so from: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6543 -Marshall On Jul 24, 7:06 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > Want to boost doctest coverage in Sage by 0.5%? Review the ticket > > >

[sage-devel] Re: boost coverage by 0.5%

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 4:59 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Want to boost doctest coverage in Sage by 0.5%?  Review the ticket > > > OK, done! william --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-

[sage-devel] Re: boost / python / sage question

On 15/08/2008, at 12:49 PM, David Philp wrote: > > Hi > >>> I forgot to mention that this is boost 1.35.0. I assume it is a >>> difference between the boosts, because sage is unlikely to have >>> changed without you noticing. I am now compiling sage 3.0.3 and >>> 3.0.6 >>> with the --enable-