>
> There is nothing strange in this log, everything looks as expected.
>
Okay. That is reasonable because this was building from scratch, and it
finished without problem.
We need to look at the config.log of gsl to see the error it gives.
>
The error was from an incremental build from an old
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:58 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:10:25 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
>> ... you can see it in top-level config.log (the following is what you see
>> if openblas is accepted):
>>
>> ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:10:25 PM UTC+9 dim...@gmail.com wrote:
> ... you can see it in top-level config.log (the following is what you see
> if openblas is accepted):
>
> ## Checking whether SageMath should install SPKG openblas... ##
> ##
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 3:02 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:09:07 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>> One guess would be that ./configure found what it thought was a usable
>> installation of openblas, but when gsl tried to build, that openblas was
>> not in
On Thursday, September 30, 2021 at 5:09:07 AM UTC+9 John H Palmieri wrote:
> One guess would be that ./configure found what it thought was a usable
> installation of openblas, but when gsl tried to build, that openblas was
> not in fact usable.
>
Perhaps. That is strange. It was "not
One guess would be that ./configure found what it thought was a usable
installation of openblas, but when gsl tried to build, that openblas was
not in fact usable. You can bypass this by either installing a system
version of gsl or using `./configure --with-system-openblas=no` to force
Sage to
On Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 2:29:34 AM UTC-7 vdelecroix wrote:
> I had the exact same trouble building the optional package barvinok
I don't think this is the same problem
>
> that has 3 dependencies : ntl, isl and polylib. Running
> 'sage -i barvinok' gave me an error that shows
On Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 2:03:15 AM UTC-7 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> I started to build the latest Sage 9.5.beta2 from some old Sage
> installation on Mac. Then it failed [...]
>
When incremental builds fail, use "make distclean" to start from scratch.
--
You received this message
"sage -i " is deprecated. Please use "make ".
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:29 AM Vincent Delecroix <
20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I had the exact same trouble building the optional package barvinok
> that has 3 dependencies : ntl, isl and polylib. Running
> 'sage -i barvinok' gave me an
I had the exact same trouble building the optional package barvinok
that has 3 dependencies : ntl, isl and polylib. Running
'sage -i barvinok' gave me an error that shows that isl was not built
[barvinok-0.41.1] basis_reduction.c:5:10: fatal error: isl/val_gmp.h: No
such file or directory
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 10:06 AM Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> My question is: why "make" does not build openblas first and then gsl,
> instead of forcing me to do this manually?
"make" does what ./configure tells it to do. Normally speaking one doesn't
need to build openblas nor gsl if using Homebrew
My question is: why "make" does not build openblas first and then gsl,
instead of forcing me to do this manually?
On Wednesday, September 29, 2021 at 6:03:15 PM UTC+9 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I started to build the latest Sage 9.5.beta2 from some old Sage
> installation on Mac. Then it
12 matches
Mail list logo
