> > 2.) Having done this (or even not), shall we deliver the Mac OS X
> > binary distributions in one and the same directory, i.e. discard the
> > distinction (see E above) between "intel" and "powerpc" binary
> > directories? (This would imply that we should add some mechanism(s) in
> > the Sage
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On May 11, 1:53 pm, Roman Pearce wrote:
>> For what it's worth, PowerPC is totally obsolete and there were not
>> that many 32-bit only Intel Macs shipped before they switched to the
>> Core2. I think you would do fine supporting only 6
On May 11, 1:53 pm, Roman Pearce wrote:
> For what it's worth, PowerPC is totally obsolete and there were not
> that many 32-bit only Intel Macs shipped before they switched to the
> Core2. I think you would do fine supporting only 64-bit x86 on 10.5
> and 10.6. That should cover everything bac
I have the honor of owning a CoreDuo MacMini, and iBook G4, and a
Core2Duo
MacBook Pro. All of these machines are in good health and produce very
adequate
performance. That said, to keep Sage current on all three machines I
need
OS10.4 32bit PowerPC G4, OS10.6 32bit CoreDuo, and OS10.6 64bit
Core2D
For what it's worth, PowerPC is totally obsolete and there were not
that many 32-bit only Intel Macs shipped before they switched to the
Core2. I think you would do fine supporting only 64-bit x86 on 10.5
and 10.6. That should cover everything back to Fall 2006, i.e. 0-4
year old machines, and at
