On Thu, 6 Jun 2019 15:08 Michael Jung, wrote:
> How can I delete the actual branch on trac and create a new one?
>
this can be done with the usual git commands - google for git delete remote
branch
> And: How do I merge properly to the recent beta version?
>
a proper way would be to do git
How can I delete the actual branch on trac and create a new one?
And: How do I merge properly to the recent beta version?
I am sorry, it seems I'm too stupid for git trac.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
Damn it, I feel so stupid! :D Thanks, this did the job. :)
Am 15.05.2019 um 14:48 schrieb Travis Scrimshaw:
However, the interesting part for me is the commutative subalgebra
of even mixed forms which I could certainly implement. But I am
not sure whether this will work due to the
>
>
> However, the interesting part for me is the commutative subalgebra of even
> mixed forms which I could certainly implement. But I am not sure whether
> this will work due to the error message above...
>
The error message indicates what you need to do: implement an is_field()
method that
Actually, I get the error:
---
AttributeErrorTraceback (most recent call last)
in ()
> 1 det = matrix.determinant(); show(det)
I think a lot of the matrix code is assumed to work over commutative rings,
but there is no assumption on them being fields. The MixedFormAlgebra is
not commutative, correct? If so, I think the best thing is to implement
what you need (i.e., the determinant) as a separate function for now.
Unfortunately, I noticed that the algorithm of computing the determinant of
MixedForm elements doesn't work for matrices of dimension higher than 3
since MixedFormAlgebra isin general not a field.
So, is it useful to create a new matrix class for this kind of purpose? If
so, how is the matrix
Hello,
Having vector bundles would be nice! But what do you mean by
*abstract* vector bundle?
Ah. I meant vector bundles without specifying any maps. But since
changes of frames/coordinates and continuations are convenient to have,
this seems unavoidable. Where would you start if you'd program
Hi,
Le jeudi 2 mai 2019 13:12:43 UTC+2, Michael Jung a écrit :
>
> Hey there,
> for the next step of implementing characteristic classes, I'd like to
> implement abstract vector bundles.
>
> 1) Do you agree?
>
Having vector bundles would be nice! But what do you mean by *abstract*
vector
