[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-03-03 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > On Mar 1, 2009, at 9:26 AM, William Stein wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> >>> I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at >>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-03-02 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mar 1, 2009, at 9:26 AM, William Stein wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> >> I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you find coercion baffling, >> confusing, or unuseful, this is especia

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-03-01 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:26 PM, William Stein wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> >>> I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at >>> http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you fi

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-03-01 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:26 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> >> I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you find coercion baffling, >> confusing, or unuseful, this is espe

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-03-01 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at > http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you find coercion baffling, > confusing, or unuseful, this is especially for you. I am sure there > is lots of room for improveme

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-02-18 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Nick Alexander wrote: > > > On 18-Feb-09, at 3:30 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > >> >> Dear Robert, >> >> On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 03:57:07PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> ... Would it be possible to add the following functionality (with whateve

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-02-18 Thread Nick Alexander
On 18-Feb-09, at 3:30 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > Dear Robert, > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 03:57:07PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> ... >>> Would it be possible to add the following functionality (with >>> whatever >>> appropriate syntax): >>> >>> declare_conversion(source, t

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-02-18 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Robert, On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 03:57:07PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > ... > > Would it be possible to add the following functionality (with whatever > > appropriate syntax): > > > > declare_conversion(source, target, morphism) > > > > which would adds the morphism from sourc

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-02-14 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 14, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > > Dear Robert, > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:34:02PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >> I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at >> http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you find coercion baffling, >> conf

[sage-devel] Re: Coercion documentation

2009-02-14 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Robert, On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:34:02PM -0800, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > I have written up extensive documentation on the coercion model at > http://wiki.sagemath.org/coercion . If you find coercion baffling, > confusing, or unuseful, this is especially for you. I am sure th