On Tuesday, 29 November 2016 05:57:09 UTC+11, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> Dear sage-devel,
>
> This is a follow-up to a discussion on sage-support [0] in which
> the original poster asks a question which I will summarize as:
>
> Having written some amount of Sage code for a project,
> how can I
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:41 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2016-12-07 14:52, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
>> better be merged into Sage.
>
> "
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 9:41:32 AM UTC-6, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2016-12-07 14:52, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>> > What do you think?
>>
>> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
>> better be
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 9:41:32 AM UTC-6, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2016-12-07 14:52, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> > What do you think?
>
> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
> better be merged into Sage.
>
If it is an independent package, then ther
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 4:41:32 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>>
>> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
>> better be merged into Sage.
>
>
> It seems a nice way to share code that enhances Sage
On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 4:41:32 PM UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
>
> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
> better be merged into Sage.
>
It seems a nice way to share code that enhances Sage in special areas, with
least "friction". Users (and devel
On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2016-12-07 14:52, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>>
>> What do you think?
>
>
> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
> better be merged into Sage.
"According to the CRAN website, Currently, the CRAN package reposit
On 2016-12-07 14:52, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
What do you think?
Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would
better be merged into Sage.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
Hi,
I am thinking of developing an external package in the direction of
"experimental feature branches" among the work flows described
in https://wiki.sagemath.org/CodeSharingWorkflow. Examples for this work
flow, I think, could be found in the numerous track tickets with milestone
"sage
