2009/3/19 Hazem :
>
>
> That is too bad, since MuPAD was conceived and created at a public
> university, supported by public funds, it does not seem right that a
> private company (The Mathworks) should have exclusive rights to the
> source code.
>
> Hazem
I agree that this is unfortunate. Magma
That is too bad, since MuPAD was conceived and created at a public
university, supported by public funds, it does not seem right that a
private company (The Mathworks) should have exclusive rights to the
source code.
Hazem
On Mar 19, 11:18 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 03:44:15PM +0100, Florent Hivert wrote:
>
> Dear Hazem,
>
> > Can anybody confirm that MuPAD was open source / viewable source at
> > one time (when it was at the University of Paderborn), and if so,
> > where to obtain the source?
>
> If it was fully open it was a
Dear Hazem,
> Can anybody confirm that MuPAD was open source / viewable source at
> one time (when it was at the University of Paderborn), and if so,
> where to obtain the source?
If it was fully open it was at its very beginning (ie prior version 1.4 in
2000). The library which contains t
