On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 12:24:25PM -0800, Alexandre Blondin Massé wrote:
> > Something which is quite related is how species / lazy power series
> > can be defined by implicit equations in Sage:
> >
> > sage: L = LazyPowerSeriesRing(QQ)
> > sage: one = L(1)
> > sage: monom =
Hi, Nicolas!
On 23 fév, 02:44, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Hi Alexandre!
>
>
> I assume Eviatar's message was really about using Sage's symbolic
> capabilities for manipulating systems of equations. Not Sage's
> symbolic solver. So one could imagine doing something like:
>
> sage: sy
Hi Alexandre!
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:13:57PM -0800, Alexandre Blondin Massé wrote:
> On 16 fév, 15:52, Eviatar wrote:
> > Another option would be to use Sage's existing symbolic capabilities.
> > For example:
> >
> > sage: solve(u*v==log(u*v), u)
> > [u == log(u*v)/v]
>
> The equatio
You're right!
Thanks!
Alex
On 16 fév, 17:42, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Alexandre Blondin Massé
>
> wrote:
> > Maybe it's worth including such a package in Sage if it's not already
> > done?
>
> I believe it's included in matplotlib as matplotlib.pyparsing.
>
> --Mi
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:40 PM, Alexandre Blondin Massé
wrote:
> Maybe it's worth including such a package in Sage if it's not already
> done?
I believe it's included in matplotlib as matplotlib.pyparsing.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsub
>
> > In that case I would think specialized functions would be better, such
> > as palindromes(u). For parsing, could you not use regular expressions?
>
> I guess regular expressions would be ok, but more work is needed.
> Ideally, I would like to delegate that work to a module that does all
> the
On 16 fév, 15:52, Eviatar wrote:
> Another option would be to use Sage's existing symbolic capabilities.
> For example:
>
> sage: solve(u*v==log(u*v), u)
> [u == log(u*v)/v]
The equations I'm handling are on words, not on numbers. More
precisely, the * operation is the concatenation (it has a mon
On 16 fév, 15:47, Eviatar wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm wondering why you would want to include it like this; it doesn't
> follow Python syntax. "=" is for assignment, and this: "u * v = phi(u
> * v)" would return a syntax error in Python. I suppose you mean "=="?
This would be a new syntax between sin
Another option would be to use Sage's existing symbolic capabilities.
For example:
sage: solve(u*v==log(u*v), u)
[u == log(u*v)/v]
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
Hello!
I'm wondering why you would want to include it like this; it doesn't
follow Python syntax. "=" is for assignment, and this: "u * v = phi(u
* v)" would return a syntax error in Python. I suppose you mean "=="?
In that case I would think specialized functions would be better, such
as palindro
10 matches
Mail list logo
