[sage-devel] Re: Plotting is too complicated....

2008-11-01 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Nov 1, 2008, at 6:28 AM, David Joyner wrote: > > In principle, it's possible to insert a try except clause into the > plot command, > so that it would > > try: > plot(x^2,2,10) > except: > plot(lambda x:real(zeta(x)),2,10) > > There might be more efficient solutions though. I think this

[sage-devel] Re: Plotting is too complicated....

2008-11-01 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 1, 6:21 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I know about plot?. But you misread my post. I was not trying to > type Maple commands into Sage. > > I was wondering why there should be such a blatant difference > between plotting x->x^2 and plotting the zeta function on

[sage-devel] Re: Plotting is too complicated....

2008-11-01 Thread David Joyner
In principle, it's possible to insert a try except clause into the plot command, so that it would try: plot(x^2,2,10) except: plot(lambda x:real(zeta(x)),2,10) There might be more efficient solutions though. On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 9:21 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I

[sage-devel] Re: Plotting is too complicated....

2008-11-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know about plot?. But you misread my post. I was not trying to type Maple commands into Sage. I was wondering why there should be such a blatant difference between plotting x->x^2 and plotting the zeta function on an interval on the real axis. My point was that Maple shows this is not necessary

[sage-devel] Re: Plotting is too complicated....

2008-11-01 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 1, 4:59 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > I want to make a simple plot for a talk. As an experiment I try > > plot(x^2,2,10)     (*) > > and it works as expected. So happily I go for the real thing > > plot(zeta(x),2,10)       (**) > > Unfortunately I get a long l