Dear Dr. David Kirkby,
first of all, thank you for you ongoing interest in PolyBoRi.
> 1) Ignore even the most basic things like CXX, and its claimed CC too,
> but I have not verified that.
For the way, how to force PolyBoRi to obey given environment
variables, see my "15 months old patch" at
h
On Tuesday 14 July 2009, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> There is a ticket about updating PolyBoRi (Polynomials over Boolean
> Rings, which means nothing at all to me).
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6177
>
> but no decision seems to have been made.
I am going to visit Kaiserslautern (i.e. Po
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Martin
Albrecht wrote:
>> The last is based on a patch submitted 15 months ago, which has been
>> ignored for all that time:
>>
>> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2999
>
> I am sorry to hear that. I would suspect -- it is certainly true for me --
> that mos
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Dear Dr. David Kirkby,
> first of all, thank you for you ongoing interest in PolyBoRi.
>
>> 1) Ignore even the most basic things like CXX, and its claimed CC too,
>> but I have not verified that.
> For the way, how to force PolyBoRi to obey given environment
> variables,
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Martin
> Albrecht wrote:
>
>
>
>>> The last is based on a patch submitted 15 months ago, which has been
>>> ignored for all that time:
>>>
>>> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2999
>> I am sorry to hear that. I would suspect -- it is cer
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Martin
>> Albrecht wrote:
>>
>>
>>
The last is based on a patch submitted 15 months ago, which has been
ignored for all that time:
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/2999
>>> I am sorry to hear
Hi David,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>> I'm building Sage 4.1 on t2 at the moment; it has been going on for
>> hours now. This build uses David Kirkby's updated spkgs:
>>
>> polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg at
>> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6437
>>
>> pari-2.3.3.p1
Hello!
Thanks for your efforts.
The problem is, that for CXX then SUN-compiler was used.
You can pass the CXX
scons CXX='g++'
custom.py
CXX='g++'
At the moment, we don't know, why Suns compiler is used for C++, while
gcc is used for C.
Michael
On 15 Jul., 08:22, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
Hello everybody,
> At the moment, we don't know, why Suns compiler is used for C++, while
> gcc is used for C.
I was just wondering: once somebody said, that Sage uses a patched
version of scons, which gives gcc priority over CC. Maybe that patch
was incomplete (lacks g++?) and that causes the in
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I'm building Sage 4.1 on t2 at the moment; it has been going on for
>>> hours now. This build uses David Kirkby's updated spkgs:
>>>
>>> polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg at
>>> http://sagetrac.org/sag
Michael Brickenstein wrote:
> Hello!
> Thanks for your efforts.
> The problem is, that for CXX then SUN-compiler was used.
>
> You can pass the CXX
> scons CXX='g++'
>
> custom.py
> CXX='g++'
>
> At the moment, we don't know, why Suns compiler is used for C++, while
> gcc is used for C.
> Micha
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>> At the moment, we don't know, why Suns compiler is used for C++, while
>> gcc is used for C.
> I was just wondering: once somebody said, that Sage uses a patched
> version of scons, which gives gcc priority over CC. Maybe that patch
> was incomplete (
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
I'm building Sage 4.1 on t2 at the moment; it has been going on for
hours now. This build uses David Kirkby'
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Here's is a summary of what can be seen happening in
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/logs/solaris-install-log-from-mvngu.log
>
> 1) Link 655 and 666 show
>
> "Checking for the operating system and linker, to find appropriate flags
> for
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:16 PM, Dr. David
>>> Kirkby wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
> I'm building Sage 4.1 on t2 at the moment; it has been going on for
> hours
Hello Dave,
> The difference is I don't have CC and friends in the path.
I see. It seems, that scons select different compilers for compiling
object files for the use within shared and non-shared libraries. This
effect is new to me, maybe it depends on the version of scons. I'll
have a look at it
Hi Alexander,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 11:37 PM, Alexander
Dreyer wrote:
> For the time being: could you or Minh Nguyen post the output of the
> following command line:
>
> echo "print Environment().Dump()" > dummy.txt ; scons -f dummy.txt;
> rm dummy.txt
>
> (If possible: with and without the
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Hello Dave,
>
>> The difference is I don't have CC and friends in the path.
> I see. It seems, that scons select different compilers for compiling
> object files for the use within shared and non-shared libraries. This
> effect is new to me, maybe it depends on the versi
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg at
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6437
I'm still reviewing this ticket. I've started rebuilding a fresh copy
of Sage 4.1 from scratch on t2 with these updated spkg's:
[1] pari-2.3.3.p1.s
Hello again,
> I did receive your email, and replied asking what use name you wanted. I
> don't see to have a response to that.
Unfortunately, I did not receive your reply. (Maybe our global
spamfilter
skipped the mails coming via googlemail.) Here's a direct E-Mail from
my
account here.
> You m
Alexander Dreyer wrote:
> Hello again,
>> I did receive your email, and replied asking what use name you wanted. I
>> don't see to have a response to that.
> Unfortunately, I did not receive your reply. (Maybe our global
> spamfilter
> skipped the mails coming via googlemail.) Here's a direct E-M
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg at
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6437
>
> I'm still reviewing this ticket. I've started rebuilding a fresh copy
> of Sage 4.1 from scratch on t2 with t
Hi David,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> It's also unfortunate the NFS shared disks are slow. You might consider
> building in /scratch, which is a local disk on t2, or /tmp. Obviously
> /tmp is not backed up, but neither is /scratch too.
Yes, I've always do develo
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>> It's also unfortunate the NFS shared disks are slow. You might consider
>> building in /scratch, which is a local disk on t2, or /tmp. Obviously
>> /tmp is not backed up, but neither is /scra
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> It's also unfortunate the NFS shared disks are slow. You might consider
>>> building in /scratch, which is a local disk on t2
Hi David,
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>> [4] polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6437 [still reviewing]
>
> It's unfortunate you will have to wait for atlas to build. I wish I
> could work out how to save the intermediate files. If I
Hi,
> PolyBori now fails saying that there are too many errors. The full
> compressed log is available at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/solaris-install-poly...
I've had a look at it (and the output above).
Try to add:
opts.Add('SHCXX', 'C++ Compiler (preparing shared libs)
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Alexander
Dreyer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>> PolyBori now fails saying that there are too many errors. The full
>> compressed log is available at
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/solaris-install-poly...
> I've had a look at it (and the output above).
>
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Alexander
> Dreyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>> PolyBori now fails saying that there are too many errors. The full
>>> compressed log is available at
>>>
>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/solaris-install-poly...
>> I've had a look at i
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Alexander
> Dreyer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>> PolyBori now fails saying that there are too many errors. The full
>>> compressed log is available at
>>>
>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/solaris-install-poly...
>> I've had a look at i
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Alexander
>> Dreyer wrote:
>>> Hi,
PolyBori now fails saying that there are too many errors. The full
compressed log is available at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/patch/solaris-instal
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> As a quick hack, I have managed to build polybori. I've done that by
> ensuring that the Sun tools are no longer in the path, as there are no
> longer any links to the Sun tools to /usr/bin. Apparently when Sun
> Studio is in
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>> As a quick hack, I have managed to build polybori. I've done that by
>> ensuring that the Sun tools are no longer in the path, as there are no
>> longer any links to the Sun tools to /usr/bin
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> To get around the MPIR problem on 't2', I've changed the default version
> of gcc on 't2' from 4.4.0 to 4.2.4. Since doing that, it would appear
> polybori is failing to build on 't2', but there might be some other
> reason. So certainly testing
Sorry, it is mpfr NOT
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> Hi Minh,
>
> The package I made at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/polybori/polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg
I see some junk in that spkg:
[mv...@sage polybori-0.5rc.p9]$ hg st
M SPKG.txt
M patches/SCon
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi Minh,
>>
>> The package I made at
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/polybori/polybori-0.5rc.p9.spkg
>
> I see some junk in that spkg:
>
> [mv...@sage polyb
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
>> I see some junk in that spkg:
>>
>> [mv...@sage polybori-0.5rc.p9]$ hg st
>> M SPKG.txt
>> M patches/SConstruct
>> M patches/custom.py
>> ? patches/SConstruct.p7
>
> Sorry, my errro.
No worries.
> The modification time on the pack
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I see some junk in that spkg:
>>>
>>> [mv...@sage polybori-0.5rc.p9]$ hg st
>>> M SPKG.txt
>>> M patches/SConstruct
>>> M patches/custom.py
>>> ? patches/SConstruct.p7
>> Sorry, my errro.
>
> No worries.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> I forgot. Try:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg
>
> it should make no difference whatsoever, as the version of gcc in use
> should be ok without the patch, but you can at least try it
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>> I forgot. Try:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg
>>
>> it should make no difference whatsoever, as the version of gcc in use
>> should be ok without the
Hi David,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David
> Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
>> I forgot. Try:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg
>>
>> it should make no difference whatsoever, as the versio
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
Hi Minh
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I forgot. Try:
>>>
>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg
>>>
>>> it should m
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Dr. David
>> Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> I forgot. Try:
>>>
>>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/Solaris-fixes/mpfr/mpfr-2.4.1p0.spkg
>>>
>>> it should make no d
Hi David,
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Dr. David
Kirkby wrote:
> The patch I posted did allow polybori to build on my home machine, as it
> fixed the linker flag issues. But it did still fail to build on t2, due
> to the presenec of /opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC.
>
> Alexander Dreyer has sent me s
44 matches
Mail list logo
