On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
We should do this as part of the tests, collect timing data on each
test block (and perhaps even each line?). There have been vague plans
to do this for a while, and I thought about waiting for it before
On 24 July 2010 07:13, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
We should do this as part of the tests, collect timing data on each
test block (and perhaps even each line?). There have been vague plans
to do
On Jul 24, 8:10 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
We should do this as part of the tests, collect timing data on each
test block (and perhaps even each line?).
I don't think this would work for all lines because completing all the
tests would take too long (if we want to
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 8:10 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
We should do this as part of the tests, collect timing data on each
test block (and perhaps even each line?).
I don't think this would work
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Robert Bradshaw
rober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Harald Schilly
harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 24, 8:10 am, Robert Bradshaw rober...@math.washington.edu
wrote:
We should do this as part of the tests, collect timing
You might find this interesting...
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.110.7221rep=rep1type=pdf
Taivalsaari, Antero On the Notion of Inheritance
ACM Computing Surveys, Vol 28 No 3 Sept 1996
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Harald Schilly
IMHO, we need a benchmark to benchmark a large part of Sage, then
compare that from release to release and see if there are any
significant changes.
+1 but... Is there any existing automatic way to do that ? For example
through plugging a few lines of script in Sphinx, which is already
