[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-26 Thread Justin C. Walker
Hi, Michael, On Nov 25, 2008, at 11:28 , mabshoff wrote: > On Nov 25, 8:25 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Nov 23, 2008, at 03:37 , mabshoff wrote: > >> Built w/o problems on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Core 2 Duo). Test (-j2) >> showed no failures. > > I am surprised that the mi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-25 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:14 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Nov 25, 12:11 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Jaap, > >> On Fedora 10, 32 bits (released today!) I got a build error: >> >> >>

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-25 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 25, 12:11 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Jaap, > On Fedora 10, 32 bits (released today!) I got a build error: > > > === = > BUILDING MATPLOTLIB >  

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-25 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The > total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I > guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches > to go around :). The door before the big ReST tra

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-25 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 25, 8:25 am, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 23, 2008, at 03:37 , mabshoff wrote: > hi Justin, > Built w/o problems on Mac OS X, 10.4.11 (Core 2 Duo).  Test (-j2)   > showed no failures. I am surprised that the missing __init__.py does not bite anyone on OSX, but

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-25 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Nov 23, 2008, at 03:37 , mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The > total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I > guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches > to go around :). T

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread John H Palmieri
On Nov 23, 3:37 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. On Intel Mac OS X 10.5: built successfully, sage -testlong returned three known issues: #3758, sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/crypto/mq/sr.py #3760, sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/schemes/elliptic_cu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > > > On Nov 23, 2:15 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> mabshoff wrote: > > Hi Jaap, > >>> Jaap: do you have M2 installed and if so which release? If you don't >>> have M2 we have an issue with the toy implementation of Gbases over >>> ZZ. >> Macaulay 2, version 1.1

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 23, 2:15 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: Hi Jaap, > > Jaap: do you have M2 installed and if so which release? If you don't > > have M2 we have an issue with the toy implementation of Gbases over > > ZZ. > > Macaulay 2, version 1.1 > with packages: Classic, Co

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > > > On Nov 23, 2:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [...] >>> On Fedora 9, 32 bits: >>> The following tests failed: >>>sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 23, 2:05 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > mabshoff wrote: > >> Hello folks, > > >> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The > >> total number of ticket with patches is

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > mabshoff wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The >> total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I >> guess I don't need to point out that there

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The > total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I > guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches > to go around :). The door before the big ReST tra

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 23, 9:30 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is because the file sage/libs/gmp/__init__.py is missing in the > sage-3.2.1.alpha0 spkg .  (The file is present in the Mercurial > repository, but it's not checked out

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread Jaap Spies
Carl Witty wrote: > On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> >> >> /home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage-main/sage/structure/../ext/cdefs.pxi:32:0: >> 'sage.libs.gmp.all.pxd' not found > > Thi

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread mabshoff
On Nov 23, 12:32 pm, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Carl Witty wrote: > > On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > >> > > >> /home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage-main/sage/structure

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread Carl Witty
On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mabshoff wrote: > > Hello folks, > > > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The > > total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I > > guess I don't need to point out that there is still pl

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.2.1.alpha0 released

2008-11-23 Thread Jaap Spies
mabshoff wrote: > Hello folks, > > here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The > total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from 157, but I > guess I don't need to point out that there is still plenty of patches > to go around :). The door before the big ReST tra