Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.2 spkg dependency graph

2010-02-07 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:22:54 -0800 (PST), Nils Bruin wrote: > A very nice picture, but it made me notice something about the default > graph lay-out: > There are cases where a vertex lies almost perfectly on an edge. This > makes it look like the edge is incident with the vertex. If there > would b

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.2 spkg dependency graph

2010-02-07 Thread Nils Bruin
On Feb 7, 9:19 am, Pat LeSmithe wrote: > I've published spkg dependency graphs for Sage 4.3.2 at > > http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/1530/ > > Comments, corrections, etc., are welcome! A very nice picture, but it made me notice something about the default graph lay-out: There are cases where a ver

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.2 spkg dependency graph

2010-02-07 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 2:25 PM, mhampton wrote: > Those are both very cool. > > Is there a simple answer to why GAP is in such an unusual position? This might be partly accounted for by the following surprising and amazing fact: GAP does not depend on or use GMP (or MPIR)! Yes,

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.3.2 spkg dependency graph

2010-02-07 Thread mhampton
Those are both very cool. Is there a simple answer to why GAP is in such an unusual position? -Marshall -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this g