Yep!
Just got back from vacation.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Peter Luschny wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 20:19:04 UTC+1 schrieb Erik Bray:
>
>> >>> Please give this new build a try:
>> >>>
>> >>> https://github.com/embray/sage-windows/releases/download/0.1a3-7.4/SageMath-7.4.exe
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2016 20:19:04 UTC+1 schrieb Erik Bray:
>>> Please give this new build a try:
> >>>
> https://github.com/embray/sage-windows/releases/download/0.1a3-7.4/SageMath-7.4.exe
>
>
Will there be a Windows installer for SageMath-8.0?
Peter
--
You received this message bec
On Dec 24, 2016 12:50, "Dima Pasechnik" wrote:
On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 11:44:26 AM UTC, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 10:28:57 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:1
On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 11:44:26 AM UTC, David Joyner wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Dima Pasechnik > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 10:28:57 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, David Joyner
> wrote:
> >> > Eri
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 6:07 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>
> On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 10:28:57 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, David Joyner wrote:
>> > Erik Bray:
>> >
>> > Many thanks for this. Great job.
>> >
>> > I tested latest version on a windows 7
On Saturday, December 24, 2016 at 10:28:57 AM UTC, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, David Joyner > wrote:
> > Erik Bray:
> >
> > Many thanks for this. Great job.
> >
> > I tested latest version on a windows 7 machine in a computer lab at
> > work. The sage terminal w
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> Erik Bray:
>
> Many thanks for this. Great job.
>
> I tested latest version on a windows 7 machine in a computer lab at
> work. The sage terminal worked fine. The sage notebook didn't work
> well in IE (the default browser). In chrome, it wor
Erik Bray:
Many thanks for this. Great job.
I tested latest version on a windows 7 machine in a computer lab at
work. The sage terminal worked fine. The sage notebook didn't work
well in IE (the default browser). In chrome, it worked but was a
little slow. For example, "2+3" took a second or so.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Peter Luschny wrote:
>> I replaced the existing binary with a new one at
>
> BRAVO!
> All works fine.
Great!
> (only plot() gives no output)
That's strange... I thought I fixed that, and it works for me.
All it's doing to determine the image viewer is passing t
> I replaced the existing binary with a new one at
BRAVO!
All works fine.
(only plot() gives no output)
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sag
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Peter Luschny
> wrote:
>>> Please give this new build a try:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/embray/sage-windows/releases/download/0.1a3-7.4/SageMath-7.4.exe
>>>
>>> This was built incorporating the fixes pointed out
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Peter Luschny wrote:
>> Please give this new build a try:
>>
>> https://github.com/embray/sage-windows/releases/download/0.1a3-7.4/SageMath-7.4.exe
>>
>> This was built incorporating the fixes pointed out by Dima for Givaro
>> and FFLAS-FFPACK. I don't see any bin
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> there are bugs in 7.4 (which is the version your Windows version is based
> on, right?)
> that break SAGE_FAT_BINARY.
> See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21850 and
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21849
> and https://trac.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 2:48 PM, mmarco wrote:
> If you provide several binaries, I think it would be wise to advertise the
> lowest common denominator as the "standard" one, so it works for every
> user.
Indeed--it would be the default, most prominently advertised one.
More specialized builds,
If you provide several binaries, I think it would be wise to advertise the
lowest common denominator as the "standard" one, so it works for every
user.
El miércoles, 14 de diciembre de 2016, 12:59:13 (UTC+1), Erik Bray escribió:
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Erik Bray > wrote:
> > On
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> Hi Erik,
>>
>> there are bugs in 7.4 (which is the version your Windows version is based
>> on, right?)
>> that break SAGE_FAT_BINARY.
>> See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21850 and
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Hi Erik,
>
> there are bugs in 7.4 (which is the version your Windows version is based
> on, right?)
> that break SAGE_FAT_BINARY.
> See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21850 and
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21849
> and https://trac.
Hi Erik,
there are bugs in 7.4 (which is the version your Windows version is based
on, right?)
that break SAGE_FAT_BINARY.
See https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21850
and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21849
and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/21772
Did you backport these?
Dima
On Wednesd
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Peter Luschny wrote:
>> Could you tell me what kind of CPU you have? And remind me, was this
>> running in a VM (it shouldn't matter but I'm curious)?
>
>
> No, no, it ran on bare iron.
Okay, so there are at least a few instructions my CPU has that yours
doesn't
>
> Could you tell me what kind of CPU you have? And remind me, was this
> running in a VM (it shouldn't matter but I'm curious)?
>
No, no, it ran on bare iron.
Peter
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Peter Luschny wrote:
> Same problem as last time -- dead kernel: "The kernel has died,
> and the automatic restart has failed." New message:
> "Saving untrusted notebook". Untrusted notebook, what is this?
Hmm, that's too bad. Though it doesn't look like the *sam
21 matches
Mail list logo
