[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-27 Thread leif
William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev > wrote: >> On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 20:13:56 UTC-6, William wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Paul Masson wrote: What about a "packages" repository on GitHub just to store files? >>> >>> I was also go

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-27 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 20:13:56 UTC-6, William wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Paul Masson wrote: >> > What about a "packages" repository on GitHub just to store files? >> >> I was also going to suggest that. A drawbac

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-27 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 20:13:56 UTC-6, William wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Paul Masson > wrote: > > What about a "packages" repository on GitHub just to store files? > > I was also going to suggest that. A drawback is we would have to add > all trac users to the Github repo,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-27 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:16 PM, leif wrote: > William Stein wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:44 AM, leif wrote: >>> Samuel Lelievre wrote: Maybe we could create packages.sagemath.org? >>> >>> And/or create a trac plug-in which saves uploaded spkgs there/elsewhere, >>> i.e., to a location

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-26 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Paul Masson wrote: > What about a "packages" repository on GitHub just to store files? I was also going to suggest that. A drawback is we would have to add all trac users to the Github repo, so hundreds and hundreds of people, many probably not even on github rig

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-26 Thread Paul Masson
What about a "packages" repository on GitHub just to store files? On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 12:07:45 AM UTC-7, Samuel Lelievre wrote: > > Maybe we could create packages.sagemath.org? > > 2016-07-25 21:33:39 UTC+2, Andrey Novoseltsev: > > > Creating my own site just for the sake of posting a pa

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-26 Thread leif
William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:44 AM, leif wrote: >> Samuel Lelievre wrote: >>> Maybe we could create packages.sagemath.org? >> >> And/or create a trac plug-in which saves uploaded spkgs there/elsewhere, >> i.e., to a location which doesn't get backed up [the way trac >> attachme

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-26 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 6:44 AM, leif wrote: > Samuel Lelievre wrote: >> Maybe we could create packages.sagemath.org? > > And/or create a trac plug-in which saves uploaded spkgs there/elsewhere, > i.e., to a location which doesn't get backed up [the way trac > attachments currently get]. Good ide

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-26 Thread leif
Samuel Lelievre wrote: > Maybe we could create packages.sagemath.org? And/or create a trac plug-in which saves uploaded spkgs there/elsewhere, i.e., to a location which doesn't get backed up [the way trac attachments currently get]. Erik? :P -leif > 2016-07-25 21:33:39 UTC+2, Andrey Novoseltse

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-26 Thread Samuel Lelievre
Maybe we could create packages.sagemath.org? 2016-07-25 21:33:39 UTC+2, Andrey Novoseltsev: > Creating my own site just for the sake of posting a package > (which I am doing once a year or less) is a bit of an overkill. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-25 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
On Monday, 25 July 2016 08:53:48 UTC-6, leif wrote: > > In the past we were told to not attach *any* binary files because they > would end up in some (VCS?) repo where they would remain forever even > after deletion on trac. > > I couldn't find any reference to that in our current documentation

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-25 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 7:53 AM, leif wrote: > Erik Bray wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >>> Please don't attach binaries to trac; Everything that is attached becomes >>> forever part of the trac database. Which is already in the multi-gigabyte >>> range IIRC. >> >

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-25 Thread leif
Erik Bray wrote: > On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> Please don't attach binaries to trac; Everything that is attached becomes >> forever part of the trac database. Which is already in the multi-gigabyte >> range IIRC. > > That's not exactly true--attachments are not stored

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-25 Thread Erik Bray
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > Please don't attach binaries to trac; Everything that is attached becomes > forever part of the trac database. Which is already in the multi-gigabyte > range IIRC. That's not exactly true--attachments are not stored in the database. But the

[sage-devel] Re: Trac attachment limit

2016-07-25 Thread Volker Braun
Please don't attach binaries to trac; Everything that is attached becomes forever part of the trac database. Which is already in the multi-gigabyte range IIRC. On Monday, July 25, 2016 at 12:43:28 AM UTC+2, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote: > > Is there any deep reason to 2MB attachment limit on Trac?