Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-22 Thread Florent Hivert
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:12:56AM +0100, leif wrote: > Florent Hivert wrote: > >This is very strange ! I was successful in adding a random patch but trac > >seems to refuse the one patch I want to add. The offending patch is at [0], > >if > >someone has an idea of what is happening. > > > >[0] >

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-22 Thread leif
Florent Hivert wrote: This is very strange ! I was successful in adding a random patch but trac seems to refuse the one patch I want to add. The offending patch is at [0], if someone has an idea of what is happening. [0] http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/file/084e2b6120ff/trac_12717-latex_bu

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread David Roe
Is there another user that could try uploading the patch from your computer? I seem to recall you've had difficulty with trac before. It would be nice to figure out if it was based on your trac account or your computer somehow. David On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 14:00, Florent Hivert wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:03:25PM -0700, Jonathan Bober wrote: > Perhaps you just had a flaky connection, and the fact that the same > file kept failing was just a coincidence? > > There are some errors in the trac log like > > [...] > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cgi.py", line 691, in

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread Jonathan Bober
Perhaps you just had a flaky connection, and the fact that the same file kept failing was just a coincidence? There are some errors in the trac log like [...] File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cgi.py", line 691, in read_lines self.read_lines_to_outerboundary() File "/usr/lib/python2.5/cgi.py", lin

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread David Roe
I have no idea what's going on, but I succeeded in uploading it. It's now attached to 12717. David On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:23, Florent Hivert wrote: > Hi David, > > > > I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder > > > /var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist eve

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi David, > > I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder > > /var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist even though the > > ticket existed. I tried attaching a file to the ticket, succeeded, and > > now the folder exists. Try again? Thanks for your help. > I tried

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi David, On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:59:57AM -0700, David Roe wrote: > I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder > /var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist even though the > ticket existed. I tried attaching a file to the ticket, succeeded, and now > the folder exi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread David Roe
I don't know exactly what happened, but the folder /var/trac/sage_trac/attachments/ticket/12717 didn't exist even though the ticket existed. I tried attaching a file to the ticket, succeeded, and now the folder exists. Try again? David On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:55, Florent Hivert wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread Florent Hivert
Hi there, Right now trac is perfectly working (I was able to create ticket #12717), except that I can't manage to upload any attachment. Firefox show the uploading busy for hours. Is it me or a general problem ? Cheers, Florent -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@google

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:20 AM, William Stein wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:32 AM, David Roe wrote: >> This seems to be happening much more frequently right now.  Could someone >> with root on boxen either restart the postgres server or kill some of the >> postgres processes? > > Done.  I

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:32 AM, David Roe wrote: > This seems to be happening much more frequently right now.  Could someone > with root on boxen either restart the postgres server or kill some of the > postgres processes? Done. I don't know if anybody also did so in the last five hours... > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread David Roe
This seems to be happening much more frequently right now. Could someone with root on boxen either restart the postgres server or kill some of the postgres processes? I'm afraid this is my fault: I've started a few long running processes while experimenting with SQL reports and can't kill them. D

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-21 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-21 06:30, John H Palmieri wrote: > I have no idea if this is a new issue, but the attachments for > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12684 don't view quite > correctly: there are some lines at the end of the patch which move files > around, and those are not visible when you vie

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread John H Palmieri
I have no idea if this is a new issue, but the attachments for http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12684 don't view quite correctly: there are some lines at the end of the patch which move files around, and those are not visible when you view the attachment. (This may be just the same as

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread Jonathan Bober
Whatever is going on, it has to do with trac, and not the database, it seems. apache runs at 100% for a while before returning a response whenever that page is loaded. I wonder if perhaps the issue is with one of the plugins. On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > > Le mercre

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread Maarten Derickx
Le mercredi 21 mars 2012 00:22:10 UTC+1, David Roe a écrit : > > I agree that it's a problem, but I don't know what caused the change. > David > > I don't know either, but the sage logs tell me what your ip adress is :P, I was looking trough the logs to see what happend if I requested the page

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread David Roe
I agree that it's a problem, but I don't know what caused the change. David On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 16:15, Maarten Derickx wrote: > > > Le mardi 20 mars 2012 12:33:27 UTC+1, Maarten Derickx a écrit : > >> I noticed that the loading of http://trac.sagemath.org/** >> sage_trac/admin/accounts/users<

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread Keshav Kini
David Roe writes: > The patchbot link needs to be inserted into another file in this folder, but > I'm not sure what yet.  I don't have permission to edit these files, and I > need > to sleep.  If someone else can figure out what changes need to be made that > would be great. > David Jon Bober h

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread Maarten Derickx
Le mardi 20 mars 2012 12:33:27 UTC+1, Maarten Derickx a écrit : > > I noticed that the loading of > http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/admin/accounts/users now takes > significantly longer. It used to take less then a second but when I now go > there to create a new user it takes at least 5 se

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread Jonathan Bober
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:58 AM, leif wrote: > On 20 Mrz., 10:45, P Purkayastha wrote: >> On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> > On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote: >> > > What link is broken?  I'm finding the link to >> >> >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread Maarten Derickx
I noticed that the loading of http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/admin/accounts/users now takes significantly longer. It used to take less then a second but when I now go there to create a new user it takes at least 5 seconds (if not more). The stupid thing is that after having created a new ac

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-20 Thread leif
On 20 Mrz., 10:45, P Purkayastha wrote: > On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 4:43:41 PM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > On 2012-03-20 09:17, David Roe wrote: > > > What link is broken?  I'm finding the link to > > >http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/8109/trac_81... > > > from the

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread kcrisman
On Mar 19, 4:14 pm, William Stein wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, leif wrote: > > On 19 Mrz., 05:42, Rob Beezer wrote: > >> On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe wrote: > > >> > Known issues: > > >> Known improvements: > > >> *  Comments can be edited. > > > ... whether that's an improvemen

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread leif
On 19 Mrz., 05:28, "Justin C. Walker" wrote: > - I'm with Lief: I don't like the centering (although if you narrow the page, > you get a narrowed view, which is good; no horizontal scrolling needed). Well, of course one can, but that's very inconvenient. I usually have many tabs open, so my bro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, leif wrote: > On 19 Mrz., 05:42, Rob Beezer wrote: >> On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe wrote: >> >> > Known issues: >> >> Known improvements: >> >> *  Comments can be edited. > > ... whether that's an improvement ... ;-) Yes, because one often makes stupid typos in

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread leif
On 19 Mrz., 05:42, Rob Beezer wrote: > On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe wrote: > > > Known issues: > > Known improvements: > > *  Comments can be edited. ... whether that's an improvement ... ;-) > *  Seems super-fast compared to before. ??? trac is mostly as slow as before (as it was during the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread Jonathan Bober
I just made a few more changes to the trac/apache configuration. Apache now serves up (some) trac static files directly, instead of having trac do it. This should give better performance, but I don't know whether or not it will actually be anything noticeable. I also decreased the maximum number o

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread Hugh Thomas
Thanks, David and Jeroen. I haven't used trac that much, and I guess I just hadn't encountered that behaviour before, so I thought it might be related. cheers, Hugh -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-19 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-03-19 01:34, Hugh Thomas wrote: > > Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced > something like this: This happens all the time, it's not related to the Trac upgrade. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread P Purkayastha
The download image next to the files/patches attached to a ticket is no longer showing. Looking at the source, it seems that it is missing this img line: On Monday, March 19, 2012 10:20:02 AM UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > > Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs. > -- To pos

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread Rob Beezer
On Mar 18, 9:31 pm, David Roe wrote: > Known issues: Known improvements: * Comments can be edited. * Seems super-fast compared to before. * No need to scroll bottom to top to bottom to preview changes to the description, there are link-buttons to jump back/forth. ("Modify" + "View") Thank

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread David Roe
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 21:10, leif wrote: > On 19 Mrz., 03:20, "R. Andrew Ohana" wrote: > > Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs. > > More or less? :-) > Known issues: * The link to the patchbot has disappeared (thanks for pointing that out Dima). We understand what happened

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread Justin C. Walker
On Mar 18, 2012, at 19:20 , R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs. A couple of minor glitches: - I refreshed a previously-open page displaying #12555. Before the refresh, I was shown as logged in. After the refresh, I was not. A second refresh got me

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Monday, 19 March 2012 10:20:02 UTC+8, R. Andrew Ohana wrote: > > Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs. where is the patchbot icon on the tickets? It has vanished. > > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group,

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread leif
On 19 Mrz., 05:10, leif wrote: > On 19 Mrz., 03:20, "R. Andrew Ohana" wrote: > Do the trac pages have to be centered? > > To me it's a bit inconvenient, and it *may* give problems if the > (preview) pages get extremely wide due to some plugin weirdness, not > wrapping overlong lines. > > I'll try

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread leif
On 19 Mrz., 03:20, "R. Andrew Ohana" wrote: > Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs. More or less? :-) Do the trac pages have to be centered? To me it's a bit inconvenient, and it *may* give problems if the (preview) pages get extremely wide due to some plugin weirdness, not wrap

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
Trac is more or less working, please report any bugs. On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 18:47, David Roe wrote: > Trac will go down in 5 minutes. > David > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 21:10, Keshav Kini wrote: >> >> David Roe writes: >> > Strange.  We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upg

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread David Roe
Trac will go down in 5 minutes. David On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 21:10, Keshav Kini wrote: > David Roe writes: > > Strange. We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upgrade, > so I > > don't know what to tell you. > > David > > > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:34, Hugh Thomas > wrote:

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread Keshav Kini
David Roe writes: > Strange.  We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upgrade, so I > don't know what to tell you. > David > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:34, Hugh Thomas wrote: > > > Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced something > like this: > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread David Roe
Strange. We haven't actually done anything yet related to the upgrade, so I don't know what to tell you. David On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 20:34, Hugh Thomas wrote: > > Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced something > like this: > > Traceback (most recent call last): >

[sage-devel] Re: Upgrading trac

2012-03-18 Thread Hugh Thomas
Twice, today, instead of the page I was expecting, trac produced something like this: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.11.5-py2.5.egg/trac/web/api.py", line 377, in send_error 'text/html') File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Trac-0.11