Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug report using assume

2015-12-21 Thread Vincent Delecroix
With respect to http://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3058/ seems to be fixed upstream (3 days ago)... On 16/12/15 15:19, Nils Bruin wrote: On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 9:41:03 AM UTC-8, Robert Dodier wrote: If you can make a bug report about it, it would be helpful. It might have bee

[sage-devel] Re: bug report using assume

2015-12-16 Thread Nils Bruin
On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 9:41:03 AM UTC-8, Robert Dodier wrote: > > If you can make a bug report > about it, it would be helpful. It might have been reported already, I > didn't > look for it. > > This is now: https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/3058/ -- You received this message

[sage-devel] Re: bug report using assume

2015-12-16 Thread Robert Dodier
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 3:44:12 PM UTC-8, Nils Bruin wrote: > So something in sage's "sum" command causes maxima to store > a property on "n". It is possible we're triggering an error in maxima here: > Maxima does have a "scoping" system for assumptions that should > allow it to temporar

[sage-devel] Re: bug report using assume

2015-12-15 Thread Nils Bruin
On Tuesday, December 15, 2015 at 2:06:44 PM UTC-8, vdelecroix wrote: > > Now if I restart a new Sage session and start with a failing maxima > command then the behavior is different > > sage: var('k', 'n') > sage: sum(binomial(n-k,k), k, 0, n) > Traceback (most recent call last): > ... > > Va