[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-11 Thread kcrisman
Just a question from the uninformed peanut gallery - under 2.10.3 in the notebook, I get slightly different behavior for view([f,x+var('y'),25*x^2]) and show([f,x+var('y'),25*x^2]) where the show consistently seems to make all symbols the same size, First, these don't have anything

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-10 Thread John H Palmieri
On May 9, 1:24 pm, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 9, 3:25 pm, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes along these lines: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145 Just a question from the uninformed

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-09 Thread John H Palmieri
I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes along these lines: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145 John On May 7, 11:07 am, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The documentation for 'view' has one typo, and perhaps some other problems. Part of

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-09 Thread kcrisman
On May 9, 3:25 pm, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've posted a patch to the trac server with some documentation changes along these lines: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3145 Just a question from the uninformed peanut gallery - under 2.10.3 in the notebook, I get

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-07 Thread Carlo Hamalainen
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 8:12 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why? I think \[ and \] are ugly and hard to type compared to $$'s. What makes them so much better? http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~hildebr/tex/course/intro1.html quote The main advantage of the bracket pair \[, \] over the

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-07 Thread John H Palmieri
On May 7, 11:12 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should not use $$ $$ for displaying math; \[ \] is better. Should the default value of

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-07 Thread John H Palmieri
On May 7, 11:25 am, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 7, 11:12 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should not use $$ $$ for

[sage-devel] Re: documentation for 'view'

2008-05-07 Thread Dan Drake
On Wed, 07 May 2008 at 11:12AM -0700, William Stein wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 11:07 AM, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (For what it's worth, I've seen LaTeX gurus complain that one should not use $$ $$ for displaying math; \[ \] is better. Should the default value of 'sep'