mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 24, 12:31 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:49 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>>> Robert: Are you working on the updated cython.spkg or is that not on
>>> your to do list? I am sure in that case somebody else will take care
>>> o
On Nov 24, 12:31 pm, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:49 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> > Robert: Are you working on the updated cython.spkg or is that not on
> > your to do list? I am sure in that case somebody else will take care
> > of it.
>
> Cython 0.10.1 wasn't
On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:49 AM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Nov 24, 8:29 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>
>
>
>> Can we get this patch (or an equivalent one) into Sage as soon as
>> possible?
>
> I assume we will upgrade to Cython 0.10.1 in Sage 3.2.1, so if Robert
> ei
On Nov 24, 8:29 am, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
> Can we get this patch (or an equivalent one) into Sage as soon as possible?
I assume we will upgrade to Cython 0.10.1 in Sage 3.2.1, so if Robert
either (a) releases Cython 0.10.2 or (b) feels comfortable with
Jason Grout wrote:
> I'm just finishing making RDF and CDF vectors use numpy under the hood.
> The last problem I'm having is trying to use the Cython buffer
> interface in sage/rings/polynomial/real_roots.pyx to access the
> underlying numpy array.
>
FYI, Dag and I corresponded about this
