+1 interact
On Mar 8, 1:57 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The advantage of vivify is all the derivative terms that flow from it
> - you could cache images with revivify, explore 4D graphs with
> vivisection...hmm...
>
> +1 to interact.
>
> -M. Hampton
>
> On Mar 8, 3:11 pm, Chris Swier
The advantage of vivify is all the derivative terms that flow from it
- you could cache images with revivify, explore 4D graphs with
vivisection...hmm...
+1 to interact.
-M. Hampton
On Mar 8, 3:11 pm, Chris Swierczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 vivify (actually, make it +1 interact)
>
>
+1 vivify (actually, make it +1 interact)
--
Chris Swierczewski
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://group
Is there a standard/precedent for function decorations being verbs,
adverbs or adjectives?
I could see the verb from the implementor's point of view (you are
wrapping/changing the given function), but the python syntax puts the
identifying in a clearly declarative place. That indicates that it
sho
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:38 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, David Harvey wrote:
>
>>
>> operate
>> maneuver
>> modify
>> activate
>> guide
>> wield
>> steer
>> drive
>> tamper
>> mangle
>> knead
>> adjust
>> mutate
>> modulate
>> alter
>> metamorphose
>> morph
>> renovate
>> trans
On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, David Harvey wrote:
>
> operate
> maneuver
> modify
> activate
> guide
> wield
> steer
> drive
> tamper
> mangle
> knead
> adjust
> mutate
> modulate
> alter
> metamorphose
> morph
> renovate
> transform
> perturb
> animate
> vivify
>
> Well I never even heard of "vivify" b
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 8:05 AM, David Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:53 AM, David Harvey wrote:
>
> >> I'm trying to decide if Sage's new "mathematica manipulate" like
> >> functionality should
> >> be called "manipulate" or "interact".
>
> Oh and by the way, it
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:53 AM, David Harvey wrote:
>> I'm trying to decide if Sage's new "mathematica manipulate" like
>> functionality should
>> be called "manipulate" or "interact".
Oh and by the way, it looks way cool. I'm looking forward to playing
with it.
david
--~--~-~--~~
On Mar 8, 4:18 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> be called "manipulate" or "interact".
>
well, i'm not a native speaker, but what about "interactive"? would
describe it best imo.
h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-deve
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:18 AM, William Stein wrote:
> I'm trying to decide if Sage's new "mathematica manipulate" like
> functionality should
> be called "manipulate" or "interact".
[...]
> Thoughts about the above names:
>1. Mathematica calls this command "Manipulate", so if
> we call it ma
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 10:18 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to decide if Sage's new "mathematica manipulate" like
> functionality should
> be called "manipulate" or "interact".
I really like interact. Mainly because the term "interactive geometry
software" is used t
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> If you care about this new functionality, just let me
> know what you think, between the above two names or
> other names you might think up.
...
Cool functionality!
+ 1 for 'interact'
--
Hector
--~--~-~
12 matches
Mail list logo
