On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Removing the package from unstable doesn't prevent you from working on
the package. It's just a way to clean up Debian. It will be very easy to
re-upload when you will have something that builds in i386 and amd64
(though it might be better to
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
In addition, upstream reports
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, tabb...@ksplice.com wrote:
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, tabb...@ksplice.com wrote:
I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would recommend first getting
sagemath working building the copies
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Tim Abbott tabb...@mit.edu wrote:
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010, William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, tabb...@ksplice.com wrote:
I think there are a couple new dependencies that are not in Debian; there
weren't any as of version 4.0 or so. I would
Kamaraju,
Overall I like your plan. And I'd like to help.
I do not like starting with version 3.0.6. I think such an old version
is unlikely to attract many users and hence testing will be suboptimal.
In addition, upstream reports that upgrading to 4.5 is currently broken
My understanding is that upstream is very unhappy with the fact that
Debian is shipping an old version, as it generates support requests for
something that they don't want to support (3.0.5 was released on
2008-07-11).
Right. One of the points we have drive home to the users is that if
they
On 08/ 6/10 11:00 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
My understanding is that upstream is very unhappy with the fact that
Debian is shipping an old version, as it generates support requests for
something that they don't want to support (3.0.5 was released on
2008-07-11).
If anyone has the time,
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:00:19 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi
raju.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
Users do not want to install the latest version without knowing if
their problem is fixed in the latest version. But if they know that
the problem is fixed, then they make every effort to get that
