On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 9:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In the most recent patch, it does this:
>>>
>>> 1. The file SAGE_ROOT/sage calls the new shell script sage-sage-
>>> qu
On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:59 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri > wrote:
In the most recent patch, it does this:
1. The file SAGE_ROOT/sage calls the new shell script sage-sage-
quickstart, which runs sage-env and then checks for --gp, --hg, etc.
2. If it fin
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 3:52 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2:29 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Mar 19, 11:13 am, Robert Bradshaw
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nick Alexander wro
On Mar 19, 2:29 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 19, 11:13 am, Robert Bradshaw
> > wrote:
> >> On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> >> > On 19-Mar-10, at 6:53 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> >> >> On 03
On Mar 19, 11:06 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:00 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
> Another possibility might be to first check for "--gp", "--gap", etc.,
> and do those before doing the general option parsing. I.e., just do
> what you already planned, but with one optimi
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:25 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 19, 11:13 am, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On 19-Mar-10, at 6:53 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>
>> >> On 03/18/2010 10:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> >>>
On Mar 19, 11:13 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 19-Mar-10, at 6:53 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> >> On 03/18/2010 10:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> >>> Sage uses non-standard command-line options (e.g., -notebook rather
> >>> t
On Mar 19, 11:06 am, William Stein wrote:
>
> I'm still concerned about slowing down all of the "sage
> -various_system" commands. A typical use case of Sage for some
> sysadmins is to install Sage system-wide, type "sage:
> install_scripts('/usr/local/bin/')", and get scripts "gp", "gap",
> etc.
On Mar 19, 2010, at 11:06 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:00 AM, John H Palmieri > wrote:
On Mar 19, 1:36 am, William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 at 12:52AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
The main issue I see is that usin
On Mar 19, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
On 19-Mar-10, at 6:53 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 03/18/2010 10:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Sage uses non-standard command-line options (e.g., -notebook rather
than --notebook). I propose that we switch to standard ones. Here
are
two rea
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 9:00 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 19, 1:36 am, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
>> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 at 12:52AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> >> The main issue I see is that using getopt or optparse means that the
>> >>
On 19-Mar-10, at 6:53 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 03/18/2010 10:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Sage uses non-standard command-line options (e.g., -notebook rather
than --notebook). I propose that we switch to standard ones. Here are
two reasons:
+1!
When this issue came up a year or two ago,
On Mar 19, 6:52 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> > - how about "sage -valgrind" and friends, or "sage -t FILE -valgrind",
>
> I find these incredibly useful!
Great! I thought someone had said that they were broken, so I'm happy
that they're not.
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Mar 19, 1:36 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:31 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 at 12:52AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> >> The main issue I see is that using getopt or optparse means that the
> >> "local/bin/sage-sage" script will go from not depending on Pyt
On 03/18/2010 10:05 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Sage uses non-standard command-line options (e.g., -notebook rather
than --notebook). I propose that we switch to standard ones. Here are
two reasons:
+1!
When this issue came up a year or two ago, there seemed to be a
surprising amount of oppos
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Adam Webb wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 19, 5:05 am, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> Sage uses non-standard command-line options (e.g., -notebook rather
>> than --notebook). I propose that we switch to standard ones. Here are
>> two reasons:
>>
>> 1. They're standard, and standa
On Mar 19, 5:05 am, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Sage uses non-standard command-line options (e.g., -notebook rather
> than --notebook). I propose that we switch to standard ones. Here are
> two reasons:
>
> 1. They're standard, and standards are good. People used to Unix-type
> systems will expect
17 matches
Mail list logo
