Dear Martin Raum,
> Are you aware of any discussion about what should be comparable?
> Otherwise I will work our something and post it to Trac. I think this
> is the way to do it, isn't it?
You should have a look at the huge thread about
"element of integermod is element of integer?"
On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:50 AM, Martin Raum wrote:
> On 27 Mrz., 20:24, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> It would be very good to cleanup/revise the code in there, but
>> beware, it is rather fragile. There has also been discussion to make
>> *less* things comparable, so it should probably be done with
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Martin Raum
wrote:
> Are you aware of any discussion about what should be comparable?
> Otherwise I will work our something and post it to Trac. I think this
> is the way to do it, isn't it?
People have specifically complained about the complex numbers and
numbe
On 27 Mrz., 20:24, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> It would be very good to cleanup/revise the code in there, but
> beware, it is rather fragile. There has also been discussion to make
> *less* things comparable, so it should probably be done with that in
> mind.
>
> Just curious, did you have a s
On Mar 27, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Martin Raum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There seems to be a quite strange behaviour of _richcmp in
> structure.element.pyx. If the parents need to be coerced, afterwards
> left._richcmp_ is called. But if they don't, left.__cmp__ is called,
> hence
> assuming a totally ordered p
