On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Serge A. Salamanka wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>>
>> In the notebook separation, it has been a fine line between rewriting
>> things (which takes longer) and just leaving them possibly suboptimal.
>> One thing I did was completely rewrite everything that use
William Stein wrote:
>
> In the notebook separation, it has been a fine line between rewriting
> things (which takes longer) and just leaving them possibly suboptimal.
> One thing I did was completely rewrite everything that used pexpect,
> so the notebook doesn't depend on the sage/interfaces/
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> yes, i can do that. this week i'm a little bit short on time, but i
> can do it. is there already something online? just tell me any details
> that might be necessary to know, like the repository or mailing list,
> and i can set it up.
OK
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 11:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> Harald,
>>
>> Is there any chance you could design a website for "The Sage Notebook"
>> as a separate project from Sage, kind of like how
>> http://pynac.sagemath.org/ is a separate
2009/9/22 William Stein :
>
> Hi,
>
> I was able to create a limited functionality separated sage notebook so far:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/patches/sagenb/
>
> One key thing I did was abstract out how the worksheets communicate
> with another python process. I then did a r
04:11 < timdumol> wstein-3852: Oh, I've been looking through the sagenb
code, and I noticed that WorksheetProcess is an old-style object (doesn't
inherity from
object). Also, `misc/sageinspect.py` has been patched in
4.1.2.alpha2, and the changes are not yet reflected in the one y
voila, here it is.
http://bitbucket.org/brickenstein/rumcomponent/src/tip/rumcomponent/
See test_component.py for examples.
Cheers,
Michael
On 22 Sep., 17:33, Michael Brickenstein wrote:
> I am just in the progress of seratating the component architecture.
> I still have a test to
> fix.
> Then
I am just in the progress of seratating the component architecture.
I still have a test to
fix.
Then I'll upload it to bitbucket.
After that I'll have to upload it to PYPI, adjust RUM to use it.
Furthermore, I would like to create a wrapper for Pylons/TG2
(somewhere you have to hook in some config
Hi William!
> Many thanks for pointing that out! You're exactly right that I'll
> need a lightweight component architecture, and I'm glad that I don't
> have to write it.
Actually, I am not so very deep in the technical details.
But I know, that Alberto's constructions are always technically
su
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Michael Brickenstein
wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I had a small look at it.
>
> Of course, there is a lot of Sage code in it and it looks, as if you
> have a lot
> of partial problems, that will be specific to Sage/... .
Yes, there is of course a lot of Sage code in it, si
Hi!
I had a small look at it.
Of course, there is a lot of Sage code in it and it looks, as if you
have a lot
of partial problems, that will be specific to Sage/... .
So it seems, you will need some component architecture like
that we are using in RUM.
It is completely light weight.
The goal is
11 matches
Mail list logo
