[sage-devel] Re: t2.math binary for Sage 4.3.4 - no scipy*.so in there

2010-03-23 Thread Dr David Kirkby
On Mar 22, 2:04 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote: actually, sage: standard_packages() says that the following standard spkg's are not installed in a t2 build of sage-4.3.4 I made. ['cddlib-094f.p5', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'gfan-0.4plus', 'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'palp-1.1.p1',

[sage-devel] Re: t2.math binary for Sage 4.3.4 - no scipy*.so in there

2010-03-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi all, scipy is not compiled in that build, despite it being a standard package. It just won't build by default on Solaris (while it builds there if I do sage -f scipy-0.7.p4.spkg, etc). This is not only the issue with this build by Minh, but I also see this when I build sage myself on t2.

[sage-devel] Re: t2.math binary for Sage 4.3.4

2010-03-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
so .so files are missing in that build: http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/ff2964972f59429a On Mar 22, 3:06 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi folks, A binary of Sage 4.3.4 for SPARC Solaris 10 on the machine t2.math is

[sage-devel] Re: t2.math binary for Sage 4.3.4 - no scipy*.so in there

2010-03-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
actually, sage: standard_packages() says that the following standard spkg's are not installed in a t2 build of sage-4.3.4 I made. ['cddlib-094f.p5', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'gfan-0.4plus', 'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'palp-1.1.p1', 'pil-1.1.6.p2', 'polytopes_db-20100210', 'sagetex-2.2.3.p0', 'scipy-0.7.p4',

Re: [sage-devel] Re: t2.math binary for Sage 4.3.4 - no scipy*.so in there

2010-03-22 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dima Pasechnik wrote: actually, sage: standard_packages() says that the following standard spkg's are not installed in a t2 build of sage-4.3.4 I made. ['cddlib-094f.p5', 'flintqs-20070817.p4', 'gfan-0.4plus', 'moin-1.9.1.p1', 'palp-1.1.p1', 'pil-1.1.6.p2', 'polytopes_db-20100210',