On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 26/07/16 07:52, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 1:25:34 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 2) Currently this feature is intended as a developer tool only;
>>
>>
>>
>> On the plu
On 26/07/16 07:52, Volker Braun wrote:
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 1:25:34 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
2) Currently this feature is intended as a developer tool only;
On the plus side every user who is interested in Sage will immensely
benefit from the scientific software universe that ope
I don't see any reason why Sage under the WSL should be much slower than a
native app. I strongly suspect it will be way faster and certainly
infinitely better than Cygwin.
On Tuesday, 26 July 2016 14:10:57 UTC+2, Jori Mäntysalo wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, VulK wrote:
>
> > Clearly performa
On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, VulK wrote:
Clearly performance are not going to be good, native applications are
the way to go for this; on the other hand I am not sure it is much (or
at all?) slower than a virtual machine setup.
Virtualization is not emulation. CPU-intensive applications have more tha
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 at 1:25:34 PM UTC+2, Erik Bray wrote:
>
> 2) Currently this feature is intended as a developer tool only;
On the plus side every user who is interested in Sage will immensely
benefit from the scientific software universe that opens up by installing
the ubuntu-on-windo
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 1:42 PM, VulK wrote:
> I am not proposing this as our final solution since, as you point out, it is
> a suboptimal hack on many respects; I am just saying that we can use this
> today (actually from Aug 2nd) to bring anyone running windows 10 on the sage
> bandwagon with mi
I am not proposing this as our final solution since, as you point out, it is
a suboptimal hack on many respects; I am just saying that we can use this
today (actually from Aug 2nd) to bring anyone running windows 10 on the sage
bandwagon with minimal effort on our side. If I am not mistaken Bash sh
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 10:19 AM, VulK wrote:
> Hi All,
> Some time ago I briefly played with Bash on Ubuntu on Windows with some
> limited success. The situation dramatically improved recently. I would risk
> saying that our nightmares to support windows are nearly over.
>
>
> Microsoft W
Hi All,
Some time ago I briefly played with Bash on Ubuntu on Windows with some
limited success. The situation dramatically improved recently. I would risk
saying that our nightmares to support windows are nearly over.
Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.14393]
(c) 2016 Microsoft Corp
