On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:33 PM, Stefan wrote:
> Discussion in the hallway with a colleague the other day (paraphrased):
>
> Colleague: "So, is Sage working yet on the latest OS X?"
> Me: "Mixed signals. People get errors, it seems to work if you enable root
> again"
> Colleague: "Oh no, I don't w
Discussion in the hallway with a colleague the other day (paraphrased):
Colleague: "So, is Sage working yet on the latest OS X?"
Me: "Mixed signals. People get errors, it seems to work if you enable root
again"
Colleague: "Oh no, I don't want to do that. I guess I'll wait and se."
Me: "You can us
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 6:49 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, David Joyner wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>>> Are those the new binaries that I built with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes, or the
>>> previous ones? The new md5sum is:
>>>
>>> $ md5 *
>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 5:10 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
>> Are those the new binaries that I built with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes, or the
>> previous ones? The new md5sum is:
>>
>> $ md5 *
>> MD5 (sage-6.10.beta1-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.11-app.dmg) =
>>
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Are those the new binaries that I built with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes, or the
> previous ones? The new md5sum is:
>
> $ md5 *
> MD5 (sage-6.10.beta1-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.11-app.dmg) =
> 879b8f796ffacc84a372987539a3fc4d
> MD5 (sage-6.10.beta1-x86_64
Are those the new binaries that I built with SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes, or the
previous ones? The new md5sum is:
$ md5 *
MD5 (sage-6.10.beta1-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.11-app.dmg) =
879b8f796ffacc84a372987539a3fc4d
MD5 (sage-6.10.beta1-x86_64-Darwin-OSX_10.11.dmg) =
f5eba161c01c37aa0422519dd4f028d6
On
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 4:35 AM, Christian Nassau
wrote:
> On 25.10.2015 01:03, Volker Braun wrote:
>>
>> I've used that ticket to build relocatable OSX 10.11 binaries and uploaded
>> them to http://files.sagemath.org/osx/intel/index.html. They work except you
>> can't compile stuff on top of thes
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 5:49:45 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>>
>> At least openssl very recently changed their license to be
>> GPL-compatible, so it is legal to include with Sage... finally.
>
>
> No they didn't; They announced their inte
On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 5:49:45 PM UTC+1, William wrote:
>
> At least openssl very recently changed their license to be
> GPL-compatible, so it is legal to include with Sage... finally.
>
No they didn't; They announced their intention but nothing has happened
yet. Considering that they'l
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 10:13:39 AM UTC+1, François wrote:
>>
>> That explain why I had to change the configuration for git.
>> No openssl headers, I have heard they are going to switch to libressl,
>
>
> Not sure about that, they proba
On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 10:13:39 AM UTC+1, François wrote:
>
> That explain why I had to change the configuration for git.
> No openssl headers, I have heard they are going to switch to libressl,
>
Not sure about that, they probably want everybody to use their own
proprietary crypto fram
That explain why I had to change the configuration for git.
No openssl headers, I have heard they are going to switch to libressl,
but even then, no headers? for something like ssl?
François
> On 25/10/2015, at 21:48, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Ah yes forgot to set that environment variable during
Ah yes forgot to set that environment variable during build, so it requires
a recent Core i-series processor.
On an unrelated note, Apple dropped another giant t***d on us by not
including the openssl headers any more. Only the dylib is in OSX 10.11, but
without headers we can't compile agains
On 25.10.2015 01:03, Volker Braun wrote:
I've used that ticket to build relocatable OSX 10.11 binaries and
uploaded them to http://files.sagemath.org/osx/intel/index.html. They
work except you can't compile stuff on top of these binaries since the
library install names are still wrong. In any c
I've used that ticket to build relocatable OSX 10.11 binaries and uploaded
them to http://files.sagemath.org/osx/intel/index.html. They work except
you can't compile stuff on top of these binaries since the library install
names are still wrong. In any case feel free to test and report back...
This is now http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19467
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 10:52:13 AM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 4:42:52 AM UTC+2, yomcat wrote:
>>
>> IMO, this solution will work, but is not the best one. An installer that
>> allows the user to selec
On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 4:42:52 AM UTC+2, yomcat wrote:
>
> IMO, this solution will work, but is not the best one. An installer that
> allows the user to select the installation directory (which is then fixed)
> is a better idea.
>
I don't really use OSX but afaik the preferred way is
> On Oct 21, 2015, at 8:42 PM, Michael Welsh wrote:
>
>> On 22/10/2015, at 0819, Christian Nassau wrote:
>>
>> On 21.10.2015 21:11, John H Palmieri wrote:
>>> The latest beta version of Sage should build on OS X 10.11. It has a
>>> serious limitation: you can't move the installation once it ha
> On 22/10/2015, at 0819, Christian Nassau wrote:
>
> On 21.10.2015 21:11, John H Palmieri wrote:
>> The latest beta version of Sage should build on OS X 10.11. It has a serious
>> limitation: you can't move the installation once it has been built. I don't
>> know if anyone is working on fixing
Hi
On 21 October 2015 at 20:59, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious. Is *anybody* reading this actually actively working on
> (or planning to work on) making it Sage runs on the current version of
> OS X ("El Capitan")?
>
> With the last OS X version, Sage got ported to work on it by me
Hi,
I'm curious. Is *anybody* reading this actually actively working on
(or planning to work on) making it Sage runs on the current version of
OS X ("El Capitan")?
With the last OS X version, Sage got ported to work on it by me buying
Andrew Ohana [1] a nice laptop running on OS X on the conditi
21 matches
Mail list logo
