I'm trying to avoid Elsevier and Springer, if at all possible :(
Blame the lawyers...
You could have contacted the editors, and explained the situation. They
have
their leeway with the publisher.
AFAIK, CMU would still allow you to put this text up on your homepage.
At least, if you look up home
Oh, and as another aside, I left CMU in February (I'm now
unemployed) but the last effort we had was to release our
6 year research project as open source. That effort is tied
up in legal somewhere and has been since January. Since I'm
no longer there I expect the code will never see the light
of d
Hmmm. I did work at CMU last year on a Journal article.
It was based on about 3 years of research work. The article
was completed, submitted for review, and accepted. CMU
required that I sign over the copyright to them. Springer
required that I sign over the copyright to them, despite
an agreement
On Sunday, October 16, 2011, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Bill,
> are you sure that you have signed away to your employer rights to your
ideas ?
Technically Bill only said that Uni's consider employee work intellectual
property, but he did not say they consider it *their* intellectual
property...
> W
It looks like Sage was ahead of the curve; it fits right
into this new science code manifesto:
http://sciencecodemanifesto.org/
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
F
