Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-02-03 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Feb 3, 2010, at 7:10 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2010-Jan-31 11:15:08 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" > wrote: Alex Ghitza wrote: 1) Build sage-4.3.1 with gcc-4.4.2 on Arch Linux; Sage runs fine, passes doctests, etc. Someone else gets the binary and can use it to run S

Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-02-03 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Peter Jeremy wrote: On 2010-Jan-31 11:15:08 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: Alex Ghitza wrote: 1) Build sage-4.3.1 with gcc-4.4.2 on Arch Linux; Sage runs fine, passes doctests, etc. Someone else gets the binary and can use it to run Sage 2) Upgrade gcc to gcc-4.4.3 3) Try to run sage, get

Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-02-01 Thread David Kirkby
On 1 February 2010 08:13, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-Jan-31 11:15:08 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" > wrote: >>Alex Ghitza wrote: >>> 1) Build sage-4.3.1 with gcc-4.4.2 on Arch Linux; Sage runs fine, passes >>> doctests, etc.  Someone else gets the binary and can use it to run Sage >>> 2) Upgrade

Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-02-01 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2010-Jan-31 11:15:08 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: >Alex Ghitza wrote: >> 1) Build sage-4.3.1 with gcc-4.4.2 on Arch Linux; Sage runs fine, passes >> doctests, etc. Someone else gets the binary and can use it to run Sage >> 2) Upgrade gcc to gcc-4.4.3 >> 3) Try to run sage, get errors that

Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-01-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Alex Ghitza wrote: On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:47:00 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that updates are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build gcc in the first placed. Basically, two people have found

Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-01-31 Thread Alex Ghitza
On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:47:00 +, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that > updates > are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build > gcc > in the first placed. Basically, two people have found > > 1)

Re: [sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-01-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that updates are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build gcc in the first placed. I mean update Sage with the same version of gcc - not update gcc with the same version!

[sage-devel] Should updates only be permitted with same gcc version?

2010-01-31 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
The issue reported on sage-support makes me think we should insist that updates are performed with the same version of gcc as that which was used to build gcc in the first placed. Basically, two people have found 1) Install Sage with older gcc. 2) Install the latest gcc 4.4.3 3) Try to update S