Re: [sage-devel] That discussion about the Sage distribution etc.

2024-01-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 11:01 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > From my perspective, throughout these discussions there is a strong > push against slimming Sage down by removing these unneeded packages > coming from Matthias, often coupled with responses by him (on > trac/github) I consider rude and

Re: [sage-devel] That discussion about the Sage distribution etc.

2024-01-12 Thread Dima Pasechnik
>From my perspective, throughout these discussions there is a strong push against slimming Sage down by removing these unneeded packages coming from Matthias, often coupled with responses by him (on trac/github) I consider rude and disrespectful of other's opinions. See e.g.

[sage-devel] That discussion about the Sage distribution etc.

2024-01-11 Thread Matthias Koeppe
Here's a quick overview on the discussions on this topic since 2021. (I collected most of this recently in the Issue description of https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/32532). - sage-devel: proposal - remove gcc, gfortran, python building/spkgs