On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 18:58:05 +0200
Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
I have a page on the wiki with a proposal for standard Trac keywords.
Feel free to edit: http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracKeywords
I'm not sure that all these keywords are useful, but some of them
certainly are.
I
I have a page on the wiki with a proposal for standard Trac keywords.
Feel free to edit: http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracKeywords
I'm not sure that all these keywords are useful, but some of them
certainly are.
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On 10/23/10 05:58 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
I have a page on the wiki with a proposal for standard Trac keywords.
Feel free to edit: http://wiki.sagemath.org/TracKeywords
I'm not sure that all these keywords are useful, but some of them
certainly are.
Jeroen.
I think to imply code failing
On 2010-10-23 19:48, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I think to imply code failing with -O3 but but ok with -O1 is a gcc bug
is wrong.
Well, I didn't really *imply* that, just said it was a *sign*. It is
either badly written code or a gcc bug.
From what I understand, -O3 should not break code unless
